Supermassive black holes, ancient artifacts of creation?

[2_8angstroms]

while watching a program on these unique objects much speculation surrounded their formation in primorodial dust acreations. I put forth that what we percieve as supermassive black holes are the "shrapnel" of creation. bits of the Original State which are the cause of the "lumpy" universe and the causation of dust acreation into galactic structures.<br />One must simply think of the "big bang" as a shattering of the Original State which does not require the complete expansion of all the primordial material but only a portion which has evovlved into our universe. The portion which did not undergo 'expansion" were left as "bubbles" of the condensed dimensions we exist in as the xpanded universe.<br />The apparent acceleration of time-space is somehow a function of the physics which allowed the incomplete expansion of the Original State. The conditions which formed a "shattered" rather than a complete expansion universe are fundamental functions existing outside of space/time. Since they exist in extra-dimensional non-local, non-space/time conditional states their full understanding IMHO will come with the piercing of the event horizon mathematicaly. This will require a new "math" which does not follow rigid figures, but rather a Chaos/ potential model from which the probability of space/time behavior is predicted by statistics rather than formula.<br />Glad to have found this board to get this stuff off my chest. not a whole lot of folks to converse about this with.<br />Yours,<br />2.8angstroms

 

[2_8angstroms]

Not a lot of interest in the "lumpy" early universe I guess.Any one have something more viable than the holes condensed from gas clouds? Back to a lumpy early universe even with that model.<br />WR

 

[silylene old]

Welcome to the forums.<br /><br />I think you need some evidence to back up your hypothesis. The evidence would be experimental data from today's universe, such as energy and galaxy distributions, and show that it fits your model (lots of math) quite well. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature" align="center"><em><font color="#0000ff">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -</font></em> </div><div class="Discussion_UserSignature" align="center"><font color="#0000ff"><em>I really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function.</em></font> </div> </div>