The Achilles Heel of Modern Physics

[Pentcho Valev]

Receiver/observer starts moving towards equidistant light pulses:

Frequency at the receiver shifts, which means that either the speed of the pulses relative to the receiver shifts proportionally (goodbye relativity, goodbye modern physics), or distance between pulses shifts inversely proportionally, in accordance with the formula

(frequency at receiver) = (speed of light relative to receiver)/(distance between light pulses)

The motion of the receiver cannot change distances between incoming pulses, can it? Here is a confirmation coming from the headquarters of Einsteinian physics:

Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics: "Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source...You can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, THE DISTANCES BETWEEN SUBSEQUENT PULSES ARE NOT AFFECTED, but still there is a frequency shift. As the receiver moves towards each pulse, the time until pulse and receiver meet up is shortened. In this particular animation, which has the receiver moving towards the source at one third the speed of the pulses themselves, four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses." https://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlight/doppler/

 

[Classical Motion]

You are correct, the motion of the receiver does not effect the ratio of the blink. But it does effect the period of the blink.

The motion of the emitter does effect the ratio of the blink. In which modern science is not award of.

Light has two shifts. Receiver shift and emitter shift, and they are different shifts.

 

[Classical Motion]

The fly by duration and the fly by length of one ball……. PLUS the duration between the balls…… is one period of propagation.

Think of it as an on time and an off time. A duty cycle. One on time plus one off time is one period.

The frequency of light is a blink. A ratio of on and off. If there is no relative motion, that ratio is 50/50. Half the time on and half the time off.

The duration and length of the emitted “on” time(the ball)…… never changes. Only receiver motion can distort this “on” time measurement. Because of interaction time.

The motion of the receiver changes both the on time and off time the same amount. This changes the period of the measurement. This ratio of the period does not change.

The motion of the emitter has a different shift. The emitted duration and length remains constant no matter what the velocity is. BUT the RATIO of the blink changes with emitter motion.

The space duration between the balls changes. JUST the space duration. ½ of the period.

And this also changes the period…….. but only half of that period changes. The empty half.

This is the emitter shift.

The emitter shift is asymmetric period shift. The receiver shift is symmetric period shift. Both shifts change period, but only emitter motion changes period ratio.

And when we learn to measure and use this, will give us much more precise measurements of motion.

Both motions, velocity and accelerations, rotations.

Think of laser photogrammetry of a cell with a molecular resolution. Even water perhaps.

Or very accurate star and galaxy velocities and accelerations.

Just a supposition.