I think that a gravity field is always in a state of collapse. In order to release the gravitational pressure, one needs to either turn off the gravity, or reverse it. I wouldn’t know how to reverse it, and I don’t think one can reverse it. Gravity doesn't have a reverse. I believe that if we could invert the ingredient of gravity……..we would still have gravity. I think gravity is the kind of miss-balance….. where if you were to try and reverse it…….it would give you the same effect. In other words even if you reverse the balance the effect is the same…. An attraction.
Kinda hard to explain. Gravity is a one way street, no matter which way the car is pointed.
From what I’ve been able to glean, gravity is a neutral dipole function. Every property of a dipole bond is highly asymmetrical. I believe that one or more of those asymmetric properties is the cause of gravity. And some how that attraction is trying to nullify that asymmetry. Which can not be nullified.
Ans so, if one could disassociate all of the dipole bonds, tripole bonds quadpole bonds and all nuclei bonds at the same time……. then gravity would disappear. And let the pressure go. It would take a very massive gamma strike to disassociate all the bonds. At the same time, or close to the same time.
But I totally disagree of any particle or mass/matter superposition. Can not happen.
CERN shows this. Matter breaks, fragments and dissolves when squeezed together. It burns up into fragment sparks. Fragments are NOT components of matter. One left handed and one right handed particle is all there is. That and the photons from them.
Gives us a cosmos. And that cosmos is locked and synchronized with time and length.
Light shift is duty cycle shift, not wave frequency shift. All velocities have a constant relevancy. Because of constant time and constant length.
Kinda ironic. Relativity gives you spacetime. But the relevancy of relativity or relativity squared ha ha………...gives us constant time and constant length. Think about it. How could you have a consistent relativity without constant time and length. Back at yeah.
If that made any sense. Sometimes I forget which side I’m on.
Gravity is weak and indirect, not fundamental of e. Two unbalanced e’s are needed for gravity. Only then does it shine. A sucking shine.
And of course I have no references, because no one knows any of this.
I’ll bet an anti matter dipole, an inverted dipole, where the asymmetric bond is reversed…...has the same gravitational attraction as a normal dipole.
But those things have to wait for better measuring instruments. Measuring down that small has the same kind of problems as measuring 13 billion years. Size and distance.
Not only that, when you stimulate or hold a charge, that charge can shrink so fast and small, it seems to disappear.
Huge size changes are common at the atomic level. This is only beginning to be realized. My model showed this dynamic one hundred years ago. Another big problem for fusion. Fusion is long off.
It’s going to be hard to hold a charge still. And when you stimulate a charge, you change the charge you’re trying to measure. OR try to target. A delicate touch will be needed.
Particles are very sensitive and delicate to handle. Without changing them. Especially the electron. An electron is a UN-loaded spring and does not like to be loaded. It will avoid you at all cost. The proton has the opposite personality. It’s a strong but very small pig, and it isn’t going anywhere. It will dare you, not run from you. And when you smack it, it takes what you give it and shrinks down to keep it. The more energy a charge has, the smaller it gets. The proton swallows and the electron pukes energy. There are not just dipoler in the electrical sense, they are bipolar in the property sense.
VERY asymmetric. In all ways. Different personalities. Resulting in gravity.
Dipole gravity theory. Incomplete. Supposition stage. Last on my list. Matter and light is resolved.
Gravity is still a ponderment. The last physical mystery. And handedness might be the missing pillar for gravity and entanglement. I believe dipole asymmetry comes from handedness. And I think that handedness is involved with gravity and entanglement. Entanglement is going to be hard, until we can passively measure. Or find an indicator.
It’s hard to verify when you don’t know the starting condition. But handedness is there. And it seems to flip. Gravity might be able to phase and synchronize a flip. Just a spitball.
There might be a handedness law. Or an effect we haven’t noticed. Or detected. Handedness is not energy or mass related, so it goes UN-noticed. But it’s a big deal.
A particle does not have a radius. It only has a circumference. That circumference is a closed helix that spins. That helical spin is at c acceleration. Which gives the entire helix a RELATIVE c spin.
Did you catch that? The small helical spin is at c. Making the entire close helical structure rotate at a RELATIVE c speed. The absolute length of the helix can not be changed. But the helical length can be change by adding or subtracting turns in the helix. This shrinks or expands the circumference. And that changes the relative structure rotation spin.
Did you catch that? An EM field thru the center of the charge at the right rate, can induce another turn in the helix. More energy and it shrinks in size. When the charge emits, it relaxes turns in the helix, and the circumference expands, the charge gets larger and slower relative c.
A charge has two spins. The helical spin is always at c and the structure rotation is at relative c.
I know, no one has heard of this.
It’s a method of modulating a constant. Without losing the constant. Chunking a constant. The c constant. With the e constant.
I don’t know maybe one has to be nuts to understand and explain this stuff.
Do I qualify?