- Dec 27, 2022
- 456
- 14
- 1,685
View: https://x.com/grok/status/1918903460935991739
GROK
Time dilation means time passes slower for someone moving fast, like on a spaceship, compared to someone still, like on Earth. It’s from Einstein’s special relativity, where light’s speed is always the same. For example, a clock on a fast plane ticks slower than one on the ground. Experiments prove this: atomic clocks on planes and fast-moving particles called muons last longer, matching Einstein’s ideas. GPS satellites also adjust for it to work right. It’s not an illusion and happens at any speed, but it’s noticeable only when very fast. It lets you “skip” to the future, not go to the past.
ME
Grok: "Time dilation means time passes slower for someone moving fast"
Misinformation, Grok (why are you lying?). Einstein's 1905 postulates entail that the moving observer sees clocks in his spaceship running FASTER than stationary clocks.
GROK
Your query seems to misinterpret time dilation in special relativity. Time dilation means that for a moving observer, their own clock ticks slower relative to a stationary observer’s clock, not faster. This is due to the constancy of light speed, as per Einstein’s 1905 postulates. Experiments like Ives-Stilwell (1938) confirm this effect. The moving observer doesn’t see their own clocks speeding up; they measure time normally in their frame, but a stationary observer sees the moving clock as slower. GPS systems rely on these principles for accuracy. If you’re referencing a specific interpretation, could you clarify?
ME
Special relativity says: Stationary observer sees moving clocks tick slower, and moving observer sees stationary clocks tick slower. In other words, moving observer sees his own clocks tick FASTER than stationary clocks.
Time dilation is actually an absurdity, Grok.
GROK
Time dilation in special relativity means each observer sees the other's clock tick slower, not their own faster. Your clock always ticks normally for you, while a moving observer's clock appears slower. This symmetry, not absurdity, is key, backed by experiments like Hafele-Keating and muon decay. GPS relies on it too. The claim that a moving observer sees their own clock tick faster is a misunderstanding—both observers see each other's clocks as slower due to no absolute reference frame. It's counterintuitive but well-established.
ME
Grok: "Time dilation in special relativity means each observer sees the other's clock tick slower, not their own faster."
This is incredibly silly, Grok (if you were human, I would use less offensive words).
GROK
In special relativity, time dilation means each observer sees the other's clock run slower, not their own faster, as confirmed by experiments like GPS and muon decay. Your claim that a moving observer sees their own clock run faster misinterprets Einstein's postulates. No mainstream evidence supports this view, though it highlights relativity's complexity. The standard model, where moving clocks appear slow, is robust and practical for technologies like GPS.
ME
If I see your clock running slower than mine, then I see my clock running FASTER than yours.
This banal conditional is valid, Grok, independently of whether relativity is correct, whether experiments have confirmed it etc.
GROK
Your statement, while logically intuitive, doesn't align with special relativity. In relativity, if you see my clock running slower due to time dilation, I also see your clock running slower—it's symmetric. Neither of us sees our own clock as "faster"; we each see our own as normal. This is backed by experiments like GPS and muon decay, which confirm moving clocks appear slower. Your conditional assumes an absolute time standard, which relativity rejects. Alternative theories exist but lack mainstream support. Your reasoning reflects a common misconception addressed in physics education.
GROK
Time dilation means time passes slower for someone moving fast, like on a spaceship, compared to someone still, like on Earth. It’s from Einstein’s special relativity, where light’s speed is always the same. For example, a clock on a fast plane ticks slower than one on the ground. Experiments prove this: atomic clocks on planes and fast-moving particles called muons last longer, matching Einstein’s ideas. GPS satellites also adjust for it to work right. It’s not an illusion and happens at any speed, but it’s noticeable only when very fast. It lets you “skip” to the future, not go to the past.
ME
Grok: "Time dilation means time passes slower for someone moving fast"
Misinformation, Grok (why are you lying?). Einstein's 1905 postulates entail that the moving observer sees clocks in his spaceship running FASTER than stationary clocks.
GROK
Your query seems to misinterpret time dilation in special relativity. Time dilation means that for a moving observer, their own clock ticks slower relative to a stationary observer’s clock, not faster. This is due to the constancy of light speed, as per Einstein’s 1905 postulates. Experiments like Ives-Stilwell (1938) confirm this effect. The moving observer doesn’t see their own clocks speeding up; they measure time normally in their frame, but a stationary observer sees the moving clock as slower. GPS systems rely on these principles for accuracy. If you’re referencing a specific interpretation, could you clarify?
ME
Special relativity says: Stationary observer sees moving clocks tick slower, and moving observer sees stationary clocks tick slower. In other words, moving observer sees his own clocks tick FASTER than stationary clocks.
Time dilation is actually an absurdity, Grok.
GROK
Time dilation in special relativity means each observer sees the other's clock tick slower, not their own faster. Your clock always ticks normally for you, while a moving observer's clock appears slower. This symmetry, not absurdity, is key, backed by experiments like Hafele-Keating and muon decay. GPS relies on it too. The claim that a moving observer sees their own clock tick faster is a misunderstanding—both observers see each other's clocks as slower due to no absolute reference frame. It's counterintuitive but well-established.
ME
Grok: "Time dilation in special relativity means each observer sees the other's clock tick slower, not their own faster."
This is incredibly silly, Grok (if you were human, I would use less offensive words).
GROK
In special relativity, time dilation means each observer sees the other's clock run slower, not their own faster, as confirmed by experiments like GPS and muon decay. Your claim that a moving observer sees their own clock run faster misinterprets Einstein's postulates. No mainstream evidence supports this view, though it highlights relativity's complexity. The standard model, where moving clocks appear slow, is robust and practical for technologies like GPS.
ME
If I see your clock running slower than mine, then I see my clock running FASTER than yours.
This banal conditional is valid, Grok, independently of whether relativity is correct, whether experiments have confirmed it etc.
GROK
Your statement, while logically intuitive, doesn't align with special relativity. In relativity, if you see my clock running slower due to time dilation, I also see your clock running slower—it's symmetric. Neither of us sees our own clock as "faster"; we each see our own as normal. This is backed by experiments like GPS and muon decay, which confirm moving clocks appear slower. Your conditional assumes an absolute time standard, which relativity rejects. Alternative theories exist but lack mainstream support. Your reasoning reflects a common misconception addressed in physics education.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram