Total Lunar Eclipse 2008

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

adrenalynn

Guest
<p>I guess it's time I start posting a few photos here...</p><p>&nbsp;These are all shot with a 200-500 Tamron f5.6 lens on a fixed tripod.&nbsp; The third image is an HDR image stack of 9 frames.</p><p>&nbsp;On some monitors these lack brightness/detail.&nbsp; On laptops they look blown-out.&nbsp; [sigh]</p><p>They were balanced using a Spyder Pro 2 colorometer @ 5300deg K.&nbsp; For maximum detail - calibrate your monitor... ;)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /><img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/0/4/60bb6c48-1b8c-4cc4-a460-58501809fa6d.Medium.jpg" alt="" /></p><p>This image is almost fully eclipsed, as the moon was just starting to peek through the cloud cover that night.&nbsp; 3sec exposure @ ISO 400 (Canon 20D unmod)</p><p><br /><img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/7/10/c74ebd66-fa13-4e41-babf-8827f89f9e19.Medium.jpg" alt="" /></p><p>This one may be a bit hard to see.&nbsp; If it is, I'll link to higher resolution.&nbsp; It shows what I first thought were two of Saturn's moons - after checking Starry Night, it turns out that it's one of Saturn's moons (Titan), and the start HIP51532, in Leo.&nbsp; Local Contrast was raised on Saturn using PS-CS3 to pop the moon and star out around Saturn, whilst our moon remained untouched.&nbsp; 6sec exposure @ 235mm (ISO 400)</p><p><br /><img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/12/11/dcfccf46-6da0-4232-9b22-9682ae491e0e.Medium.jpg" alt="" /></p><p>This was a 9 frame HDR image (stacked in photomatix), from 1/3000sec to 7sec, attempting to get some detail from the eclipsed portion.&nbsp; Mostly failed, but there's some pretty moonbow and some decent detail in the exposed segment.&nbsp; Next full-moon, I'm thinking of making another HDR attempt to see if I can get high-detail on a full moon.&nbsp; I suspect with HDR the big "no-no" of photographing a full moon might still be achievable. Anyone else playing with HDR?</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>.</p><p><font size="3">bipartisan</font>  (<span style="color:blue" class="pointer"><span class="pron"><font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size="2">bī-pär'tĭ-zən, -sən</font></span></span>) [Adj.]  Maintaining the ability to blame republications when your stimulus plan proves to be a devastating failure.</p><p><strong><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#ff0000">IMPE</font><font color="#c0c0c0">ACH</font> <font color="#0000ff"><font color="#c0c0c0">O</font>BAMA</font>!</font></strong></p> </div>
 
3

3488

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><font color="#ff0000">I guess it's time I start posting a few photos here...&nbsp;These are all shot with a 200-500 Tamron f5.6 lens on a fixed tripod.&nbsp; The third image is an HDR image stack of 9 frames.&nbsp;On some monitors these lack brightness/detail.&nbsp; On laptops they look blown-out.&nbsp; [sigh]They were balanced using a Spyder Pro 2 colorometer @ 5300deg K.&nbsp; For maximum detail - calibrate your monitor... ;)&nbsp;This image is almost fully eclipsed, as the moon was just starting to peek through the cloud cover that night.&nbsp; 3sec exposure @ ISO 400 (Canon 20D unmod)This one may be a bit hard to see.&nbsp; If it is, I'll link to higher resolution.&nbsp; It shows what I first thought were two of Saturn's moons - after checking Starry Night, it turns out that it's one of Saturn's moons (Titan), and the start HIP51532, in Leo.&nbsp; Local Contrast was raised on Saturn using PS-CS3 to pop the moon and star out around Saturn, whilst our moon remained untouched.&nbsp; 6sec exposure @ 235mm (ISO 400)This was a 9 frame HDR image (stacked in photomatix), from 1/3000sec to 7sec, attempting to get some detail from the eclipsed portion.&nbsp; Mostly failed, but there's some pretty moonbow and some decent detail in the exposed segment.&nbsp; Next full-moon, I'm thinking of making another HDR attempt to see if I can get high-detail on a full moon.&nbsp; I suspect with HDR the big "no-no" of photographing a full moon might still be achievable. Anyone else playing with HDR? <br />Posted by adrenalynn</font></DIV></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>Wonderful images, adrenalynn.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>Thank you very much for sharing them.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>Andrew Brown.<br /></strong></font></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080">"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before".</font> <em><strong><font color="#000000">Linda Morabito </font></strong><font color="#800000">on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.</font></em></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://www.launchphotography.com/</font><br /><br /><font size="1" color="#000080">http://anthmartian.googlepages.com/thisislandearth</font></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://web.me.com/meridianijournal</font></p> </div>
 
R

richalex

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'><em>This was a 9 frame HDR image (stacked in photomatix), from 1/3000sec to 7sec, attempting to get some detail from the eclipsed portion.&nbsp; Mostly failed, but there's some pretty moonbow and some decent detail in the exposed segment.&nbsp; Next full-moon, I'm thinking of making another HDR attempt to see if I can get high-detail on a full moon.&nbsp; I suspect with HDR the big "no-no" of photographing a full moon might still be achievable. Anyone else playing with HDR? <br />Posted by adrenalynn</em></DIV><br /><br />I have been using Photomatix for HDR for a year or two. I've often tried to use HDR for astrophotography, but I haven't been too impressed with the results, especially for Moon. I'll include a link to some photos (including a few HDR) of the lunar eclipse in March 2007.</p><p>http://picasaweb.google.com/Imagebuffet/200703LunarEclipse</p>
 
D

doublehelix

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>This was a 9 frame HDR image (stacked in photomatix), from 1/3000sec to 7sec, attempting to get some detail from the eclipsed portion.&nbsp; Mostly failed, but there's some pretty moonbow and some decent detail in the exposed segment. <br /> Posted by adrenalynn</DIV></p><p>Loved this picture, adrenalynn!&nbsp; Thanks for posting the photos you took.&nbsp; I tried to take a few shots with my little point and click, but nothing came out. <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/content/scripts/tinymce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-frown.gif" border="0" alt="Frown" title="Frown" /></p><p>Oh well.</p><p>-dh&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#3366ff">doublehelix, Community Manager<br />Imaginova </font></p> </div>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.