Venus grade: NASA seeks a lander battery tough enough to survive Earth's evil twin

So although ATB's molten salt battery can provide power for 118 days at the very high surface temperatures on Venus (480 Celcius), how are they going to get semiconductor electronics on a lander to operate for days at those external temperatures? Using thermal insulation will only keep the heat out for a few hours. Are they going to use active cooling i.e refrigeration using a heat exchanger? I suppose for simple things like a radio transmitter/receiver circuit thay could use old style thermionic valves/tubes :laughing:
 
Apr 20, 2023
33
8
35
Visit site
Use thermionic material that converts heat to electricity. We already use this material in RTG (Nuclear Football 'batteries') for space probes. All electrical connections will have to be welded to be able to withstand the 1000 or so degrees.

Old-School vacuum tubes are a viable alternative to heat sensitive semi conductors, unless they figure out how to make those delicate devices work at elevated temperatures.

As long as the 'vacuum' tubes are not exposed to OXYGEN, they won't need to be in a Vacuum (glass) envelope to operate. Oxygen would burn out the filaments (heaters for the cathodes) . Some tests should be done in a Venus Atmosphere simulation to see if the components function and have a reasonable lifetime.

When transistors were first invented (1960's), our military electronics teachers said not to expect to see many of them in widespread use because they can't handle any real power and are very temperature sensitive. Maybe the tide has turned?
 
Thermionics would not work on Venus because they need a cold sink.
Venus has "Hazy Day" sunlight, solar panels would work.
Transistors don't work above 225°C (427°F). Venus is 462°C.
Need lots of cooling, maybe a vacuum shroud.

Diamond based transistors could possibly handle the heat. First one made about a year ago.

 
  • Like
Reactions: newtons_laws
May 18, 2023
1
0
10
Visit site
I apologize, but I couldn't find any specific information regarding NASA seeking a lander battery tough enough to survive Venus. It's important to note that my training data only goes up until September 2021, and I don't have access to real-time information or updates on NASA's current projects or initiatives.
However, exploring the harsh environment of Venus is indeed a topic of interest for scientists and space agencies. Venus is known for its extreme temperatures, high download pikashow apk for andriod atmospheric pressure, and corrosive atmosphere, which make it challenging for technology to withstand. If NASA or other space agencies are working on missions to Venus, it is likely that they are developing specialized equipment and technology, including batteries, that can withstand these extreme conditions.
For the most up-to-date and accurate information on NASA's missions and initiatives, I recommend visiting NASA's official website or referring to reputable scientific sources for the latest news and developments related to Venus exploration.
 
Apr 20, 2023
33
8
35
Visit site
I know they can Radiation Harden computer chips. We used to do that at Texas Instruments back in the 70's. They may have to do a lot more work to Temperature Harden them before the Venus probe takes off. ? What's the temperature on the Surface and the temperature of the Atmosphere near the surface ? Might be enough of a ^T to allow thermionic (thermocouple) DC power generator to function. I used to build a lot of items for deep space back in the 1970's, but our concerns were Vibration on launch and the super cold temps in space.
 
There is no sunshine on Venus, thus the ground is heated by the air. They would be very close to thermal equilibrium thus not suitable for thermionics.

Radiation is not an issue as much as high heat. Noise becomes a problem in semiconductors at high temps. Germanium and silicon cannot handle 864°F, the temperature on Venus' surface. Diamond might work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newtons_laws
In general the leakage current (which is unwanted and if too large will prevent operation) of semiconductor devices increases in proportion to e to the power of (-Δ/kT) where Δ is a band gap energy, k is Boltzmann's constant and T is absolute temperature in °K. It will be seen that for a given temperature increasing the band gap causes a big reduction in the leakage current e.g doubling the band gap reduces the leakage current to only 13.5% of the previous value. Germanium has a band gap of 0.7eV whereas Silicon is 1.1eV, which is why Silicon semiconductors can operate at higher temperatures than Germanium ones. Therefore to operate at Venusian surface temperatures you need something with significantly larger band gap than that of Silicon, Carbon (in diamond structure) has a very large band gap of 5.4eV, so if diamond based semiconductors can be made then they may well be able to cope with temperatures on Venus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: billslugg
Old-School vacuum tubes are a viable alternative to heat sensitive semi conductors, unless they figure out how to make those delicate devices work at elevated temperatures.

As long as the 'vacuum' tubes are not exposed to OXYGEN, they won't need to be in a Vacuum (glass) envelope to operate. Oxygen would burn out the filaments (heaters for the cathodes) . Some tests should be done in a Venus Atmosphere simulation to see if the components function and have a reasonable lifetime.
I don't think that's correct about the tubes not having to be in a vacuum. In order for the electrons from the cathode to travel past the grid elements to the anode they need to be able to travel freely. If they were exposed to the atmosphere of Venus( which is at a surface pressure 92 times that of Earth) the gas molecules would impede the electrons movement.
 
For electrons to flow fron cathode to anode, it must be in a vacuum or else the electrons would simply ionize the gas creating a huge spark. Glass vacuum tubes would probably function function at 900°F.
Yes, in a vacuum tube conduction is dominated by free electrons because the distance between cathode and anode is small compared to the mean free path of electrons. Introducing gas into the tube means that the electron mean free path is much less than the cathode to anode distance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: billslugg

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts