• Launch Day is nearly upon us! Head over to this thread and share your thoughts before, during, and after Crew Dragon finally lifts off.

Wave drive flying saucer

Jan 29, 2020
4
1
15
It was found that the asymmetric vibrations of the object in homogeneous - liquid and gaseous media lead to the formation of a wave medium in which two oppositely directed waves of different forces, made alternately, exist simultaneously by inertia and create a pressure difference leading to uneven the release of thermal energy from the environment in the form of a vortex, pushing the object. Such an experiment is easy to repeat at home. It is necessary to lower the palm into the water and make a quick movement in one direction and slow in the other. During the reverse movement, the resistance of the water will be greater due to the energy released from the water. A series of experiments was performed in which a vibromotor that simulates the vibrations of an atom during movement was set on a float, discoid and sickle-shaped wing. Fluctuations with the help of an engine set the float in motion, and the lift of the wing in the oncoming flow increased significantly due to the formation of acoustic waves. In the near future, this principle can be used to create reusable spacecraft having high maneuverability when entering the atmosphere and capable of making a controlled landing anywhere in the world through the use of an electric motor. Video experiments

Flying saucer is a reusable air / underwater / spacecraft. The motor used on it is a movable discoid sail, driven by high-frequency electromagnetic inertial propulsion drive. With the help of the wing, the inertial propulsion drive perceives the resistance of the environment and the apparatus comes in forward motion. Thus, the flying saucer uses the principle of movement of birds, fish and other species of creatures moving in a homogeneous environment. This principle is possible in virtually any environment capable of providing resistance in which waves can be created and reflected. This allows you to effectively use the resistance of the environment due to its inertness.
For example, an airplane for the most part simply overcomes air resistance, leaving behind it an air whirlwind that lasts some time by inertia. The vortex contains energy that is not used at all. A bird creating a whirlwind with a wing wave receives back some of the energy spent on it in the form of wind, which pushes it. Thus, the bird is more efficient than the aircraft. But it is technically difficult to create a powerful and fast apparatus in the form of a bird or fish. Such designs have a large number of moving parts that do not withstand the load on friction and vibration, if you install a powerful engine on them. Unlike the ornithopter wing, the wing of the flying saucer will be able to vibrate with high frequency and low amplitude, like the membrane of an acoustic speaker. This can be achieved through the use in the design of the electromagnetic drive of the wing. The suspension of the wing on a magnetic cushion will allow you to realize greater power and frequency of oscillation with a low mechanical load.
The work of the wing in the air or water can be described as follows. The wing makes a fast ascending impulse, as a result of which a shock wave is formed above it, and the flying saucer begins to be drawn into the region of reduced pressure formed behind it. An annular vortex is formed under the wing, which follows it by inertia. Then the wing begins to make a reverse movement downward at low speed, and the flying saucer pushes off from the whirlwind, which catches up with it, carrying it upwards.



In space, a flying saucer can receive acceleration with the help of a wing in the form of a photon mirror and sail. The presence of an electron gun on board will allow the use of the wing and as a mirror of an electric sailing antenna. But unlike conventional ships that use the power of the solar wind to move in space, you can speed up flying not only by determining the pressure of the particles, but also by pushing them away.
Inertial propulsion drive works much more efficiently when there is constant resistance on one side and there is no resistance in the direction of motion. Despite the fact that the solar wind has a very low density, and in it the work of the wing will not be as effective as air or water, the pressure on it of light from only one side will allow the inertia to repel in the direction of the wind and at an angle. Thanks to this, the flying saucer will be able to accelerate and maneuver more effectively than ordinary space sailing ships. It is assumed that it is possible to generate electromagnetic waves in the direction of motion and to perceive their pressure using a sail, which corresponds to the model of motion of the apparatus in a liquid and gaseous medium.

The theory of motion of a flying saucer in a liquid and gaseous medium.

Imagine that the atoms or molecules of a liquid or gas that are as close as possible to each other as a result of compression. The only possible position in which they can be equidistant is triangles, which are combined into hexagons. This corresponds to the crystal structure of water.





Atom 1 gets a boost. Suppose that atoms move along the path of least resistance, as the arrows indicate. If these are billiard balls, then each time the impulse 1 will be divided by 3 and will lose power. But if these are atoms or molecules that oscillate, then each time during a collision, the pulse energy will increase, because the vibrating object itself creates a repulsion impulse.
Due to the repulsion of atoms, a chain reaction will occur, which will first lead to the formation of multiple vortices, the prerequisites for which are in the figure, turning into large vortices. The plate converts the force of the vortex into motion. Thus, the driving force of the saucer is air resistance.
Therefore, the energy that drives the flying saucer is taken from the environment .

Birdplane. Antigravity aircraft

Birdplane is an aircraft, which is a simplified version of a flying saucer. It uses the principle of bird movement. On the picture painted what it looks like on the example of bird flight and jellyfish movement. In reality, it has a more complex wavelike view. I simplified it to asymmetric vibrations. Based on this, the aerodynamics of bird flight, and the motion of the jellyfish are as follows: first, a vortex is generated from the environment, having a greater density and mass than the environment, and then it is thrown backwards as jet fuel. Experiment video




The lifting force of the wing in accordance with new ideas about the whirlwind.

Based on the theory of movement of a flying saucer and experiments conducted to confirm it, as well as the pattern of wing flow observed in a viscous fluid, it can be argued that the lifting force is formed as a result of the forces of intermolecular repulsion and attraction (short-range and long-range) and is equal to them. That is, the lifting force is equal to the thermal energy released from the air.

The figure shows the motion of the boundary layer in a viscous fluid. Viscosity increases the thickness of the layer and allows you to consider the process in detail. First, it must be borne in mind that the flow process is not constant, but rhythmic. The forces of attraction and repulsion prevail alternately, gradually reaching minima and maxima, which we observe as turbulence. This rhythm leads to flutter.

When the wing crashes into the air, squeezing it in front of itself, the distance between the molecules decreases, and they repel each other due to their thermal energy. Molecular repulsion forms rarefied air. Further, attraction begins to act between the molecules, and they tend to attract each other. Due to the fact that during the impact on the leading edge, molecule received an impulse leading to the release of repulsive and attractive forces, their speed gets bigger.

Therefore, they bend around the trailing edge and move under the wing against flight, reaching the leading edge, where, slowing down, they are cut off by molecules repelling from it. Due to this collision, a stream of smoke blowing the wing in the wind tunnel to the last tends to go over the upper part of the wing, even if it is moved strongly down. Thus, the shape of the wing leads to the fact that air from the upper surface flows under the lower one and creates an increased pressure there. An aerodynamic profile convex on both sides allows this force to act in the direction of flight. Molecules continue to be repelled and attracted like a spring, and after being left behind the wing like turbulence.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mati
Feb 1, 2020
79
40
60
It was found that the asymmetric vibrations of the object in homogeneous - liquid and gaseous media lead to the formation of a wave medium in which two oppositely directed waves of different forces,
Yes, you are correct. Waves in a medium that is contained can and often do strike and even push at the envelope at different times. Unfortunatly, it has been found that over time, the waves always seem to cancel each other out. So it provides no real net thrust to an object in free space.
We wish it did.
For interests sake, there was a claim in the early 1960's by a Mr. Dean that some mechanism could produce such thrust. He even had a model that did push along a tabletop with no evident reaction mass. Mr. Dean wanted a big chunk of money to reveal his system though. He didn't get it, and he died. As Mr Dean was quite old, that wasn't a surprise. Buhis invention was then taken apart and reassembled. After reassembly, it no longer worked. Devices that did something like that however were produced, They work by having a mass on a wheel like assembly that produce an off center up and down motion. The box then jumps in short hops and so moves forward. There are still some folks who argue that Deans original box worked differently. There was no up and down vibration noted in that device.
There are other "Space Drives" out there as well.
There was a great deal of interest couple of years ago regarding the "Impossible Drive" which was invented in Great Britain. This uses microwaves in an isolated bell shaped cavity, and has been found by NASA, several univeristies and the Chinese to produce small amounts of thrust. It was "Debunked" by a German team two years or so ago. The Germans found that their balance showed the thrust, but showed it b.oth along the axis and perpendicular to it.
That was interpreted as meaning that the devices were producing thrust by reacting with the measuring devices. This was broadly accepted, and the devices dismissed in the Scientific Press.
Personally, I after reading the German groups paper thought they didn't prove that the Impossible Drove didn't work, but rather proved they had a defective force balance.
There are also a couple of devices based on relativity and it's effects on gravity. Those show very small amounts of thrust when measured with force balance devices.
To date, no one has actually sent such a device into orbit and turned it on to see if there is any detectable thrust in actual space.
There is a reason for that.
The thrust produced is measured in Micro-Newtons or even Pico-Newtons per kilowatt of applied power. In other words, it's very low. Some of the devices in question are somewhat massive as well.
So it's simply better all around to use things like ion engines, which while producing a quite low thrust, are still thousands or millions of times more efficient at the cost of a few kilograms of fuel.
Maybe someday we will have a working Space Drive, but for now, we are no closer than Leonardo da Vinci was to powered flight.
 
Jan 29, 2020
4
1
15
Thanks for the short and informative story. I can add to this that a similar engine was launched into space by students on the Russian satellite Yubileiny. This did not work. All of these engines are similar to mine, but they do not provide for interaction with the environment. Such an engine can give traction only when it has a fulcrum. For example a solar sail. Using such an engine in combination with an aerodynamic surface, I investigated this possibility. And he came to the conclusion that even in air and water, such a movement is different from what science says. Therefore, I return to the old idea that ether is gas, and if you very quickly flap a wing in space, then you can get movement like a jellyfish.
 
Feb 1, 2020
79
40
60
Ether was the presumed medium for electric or magnetic waves to move through. Experiments found it not to exist. The basis there was that if the medium existed, it had to have some preferred reference frame, in other words,it had to be something. But waves moved exactly the same in all directions, in fact, moving objects saw things exactly the same. So the Ether had to be both moving as fast as a satellite did and also not moving at all relative to the ground at the same time and in the same place.
So Ether wasn't a real thing then.
Einstein explained the problem. The result was relativity. Oh, there were several papers that explained everything. Those papers are why Einstein is considered a genius.
It turns out that the electromagnetic field is in fact the medium that electromagnetic fields move through. It creates itself, using the power of the wave. This wave then propagates at the speed of light because that is the only speed it can move at. The magnetic field in it's collapse phase gives rise to an electric field, which grows, then as the magnetic field drops to zero, begins to collapse and in the process generates a magnetic field. In Physics, this is described by Maxwell's Equations. The combined magnetic field and electric field which give rise to each other is together called a Photon, and is the basic 'particle' of light.
At very small scales, all particles are composed of waves and all waves are particles. It's confusing, but that is at the heart of quantum mechanics.
Oh, and just to make things even more confusing, light beams coming from different direction don't interfere with each other. Water waves do interfere with each other. Why not?
There's a good PHd thesis in there somewhere.
 
Jan 29, 2020
4
1
15
Ether near the Earth is not required to move relative to this. The effect of the attached mass in aerohydrodynamics. The ether near the Earth moves with it. Einstein's relativity can be taken as the relative density of matter. Einstein, like Newton, was recognized as a genius only thanks to those <<Edited by moderator>> in power. Putting an end to the study of matter with his mathematical formalism, he led science in the dark. My experiment with a boat shows that this is not moving in the direction that modern science should move in. But for the sake of current theories, science does not recognize this fact
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Feb 1, 2020
79
40
60
I see
Ether near the Earth is not required to move relative to this. ...But for the sake of current theories, science does not recognize this fact
I see the Moderator didn't like some of what you put in. For your information, Newton was in no way Jewish. No, he was stanuch Church of England, and at a time when some English institutions discriminated against Jews. Einstein was jewish, vaguely, but his supporters included everyone from Italian Enrico Fermi to German Werner Heisenberg to American Robert Oppenheimer. Religion had nothing to do with it. It was all down to the mathematics.

Science is not bound to current theories. The accepted theories of any given time are frequently overturned or modified by newer ones. That's how Science progresses. Newton went against many of the prevailing theories of his day. His arguments wit Leibniz were the stuff of legend.
Einstein didn't invalidate Newton, and certainly not Maxwell. He did however modify them slightly. Those modifications are accepted because they are constantly being tested and proven correct. There have been a couple of those just this year. It happens quite often really.
To replace anything accepted by 'Mainstream Science' you will need some well documented measurements of an experiment and it has to be something that other people can do without you being involved and get the same result, and it has to be a result that isn't predicted by Einsteins work, or that produces something that Einsteins theories as presently understood denies can happen.
So far I have seen nothing like that from you.
Good luck. If you are right, I hope you succeed. You do need better data however.
 
Jan 29, 2020
4
1
15
I proposed a simple experiment that can be repeated. It is believed that a symmetrical body that performs asymmetric oscillations in water (fast in one direction and slow in the other) will move in the direction of slow oscillations, because in this direction the resistance will be less. But in fact, the opposite is happening.
Move your palm in the water. Quickly one way, and slowly the other. During slow motion you will feel more resistance due to the fact that water moves by inertia.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts