Catastrophe, thanks for your post but no bowing

I have some knowledge here based upon studies on my part for a number of years now on the subject. In my opinion, the giant impact model for the origin of the Moon is an ugly math and tidal forces problem in the equations that pops out various answers and surprises as the numbers are crunched. You asked, "Rings seem to go both ways. Either they are the result of "body" collisions or they are a stage in the formation of "bodies". Can they do both and, if so, where is the dividing condition?
My answer, I do not know here

Different papers on the giant impact model disclose different problems I see when reviewing. Here is an example,
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161102769W/abstract, "...The main concern was that models were multi-staged and too complex. Here, we present initial impact conditions that produce an Earth-Moon system whose angular momentum and isotopic properties are correct. The model is straightforward and the results are a natural consequence of the impact." The arXiv paper is at
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1611/1611.02769.pdf
So far, from what I can gather, the early Moon forms at or near Earth's Roche limit or close to 3 earth radii distance. Today the Moon orbits close to 60.3 earth radii for the mean. Another shorter report,
https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/when-and-how-did-the-moon-form/
The initial angular momentum of the Earth-Moon system is difficult and the initial length of day too for the Earth, e.g. this report has a 5 hour day,
https://phys.org/news/2016-10-theory-moon.html
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Natur.539..402C/abstract, November 2016. This paper has a 2.5 hour initial length of day for the Earth. Changing different parameters here can result in some real differences in the formation of the Moon too.
Catastrophe, I still collect information on this subject from time to time. Showing the giant impact model, *warts in all* I think is still a work in progress
