O
orienteer
Guest
The Shuttles are about to be retired, and Donatello has yet to be used. Rafaello is being retrofitted for long duration as a new ISS storage module, but I have not heard of any plans for the other two.
I am told the main reason that we do not have an orbiter around Uranus or Neptune is because the speed needed to get there in a reasonable time would be far too fast to maintain a stable orbit.
My fantasy would be to retro fit an MPLM similar to Rafaello on the outside and as a fuel tank on the inside. Mate the MPLM to the orbiter in LEO, and then use the fuel to reduce speed when the orbiter arrives at the Giant in question. I have heard that hydrogen would not be stable for a trip that long, so I wonder if we could use water in a water pistol set-up that would be fired into the orbiters path for about a week or so. I believe this would first create reverse thrust, second create resistance as we flew through the ice crystals, and finally reduce momentum by reducing mass.
Fly-bys are nice, but Cassini and Galileo are where the real science has been.
I am told the main reason that we do not have an orbiter around Uranus or Neptune is because the speed needed to get there in a reasonable time would be far too fast to maintain a stable orbit.
My fantasy would be to retro fit an MPLM similar to Rafaello on the outside and as a fuel tank on the inside. Mate the MPLM to the orbiter in LEO, and then use the fuel to reduce speed when the orbiter arrives at the Giant in question. I have heard that hydrogen would not be stable for a trip that long, so I wonder if we could use water in a water pistol set-up that would be fired into the orbiters path for about a week or so. I believe this would first create reverse thrust, second create resistance as we flew through the ice crystals, and finally reduce momentum by reducing mass.
Fly-bys are nice, but Cassini and Galileo are where the real science has been.