Wikipedia Loses Some Cred: Gaeto Signs On.

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mattblack

Guest
I know he often meant well, but gee: gaetanomarano is now having his psychedelic, multi-coloured capital letter-infested, anti-manned space webpages linked on Wikipedia in the VSE and CEV sections. (Go to bottom to see): <br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_for_space_exploration<br /><br />To think: some schoolkids will be reading this guff and using it as reference for their projects.<br /><br />Sigh... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p>One Percent of Federal Funding For Space: America <strong><em><u>CAN</u></em></strong> Afford it!!  LEO is a <strong><em>Prison</em></strong> -- It's time for a <em><strong>JAILBREAK</strong></em>!!</p> </div>
 
M

mattblack

Guest
Good God, you're right!! That was fast?! Are their moderators lurking here? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p>One Percent of Federal Funding For Space: America <strong><em><u>CAN</u></em></strong> Afford it!!  LEO is a <strong><em>Prison</em></strong> -- It's time for a <em><strong>JAILBREAK</strong></em>!!</p> </div>
 
D

drwayne

Guest
This could get interesting.<br /><br /><img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /><br />Wayne <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>"1) Give no quarter; 2) Take no prisoners; 3) Sink everything."  Admiral Jackie Fisher</p> </div>
 
J

j05h

Guest
that is definitely gaetano's paragraph at the end of the VSE entry. Not sure how much you all follow Wikipedia news, but they have repeatedly banned the US Congress' range of IP addresses from editting wiki pages. It turns out that staffers were posting libel & slander against opposing Congressmen. <br /><br />It is pretty embarrassing to see Gaetano's blathering linked along with more reasonable/official pages. <br /><br />Josh <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div align="center"><em>We need a first generation of pioneers.</em><br /></div> </div>
 
C

craig42

Guest
Intresting the Geaterno-esque paragraph was there a few minutes ago but linked to somethingawful.com <br /><br />Now it's gone.
 
D

drwayne

Guest
I hadn't seen the bit about congress. That is fascinating!<br /><br />I knew there had been a number of controversial contributions that had come up in the news a couple of months ago...<br /><br />Wayne <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p>"1) Give no quarter; 2) Take no prisoners; 3) Sink everything."  Admiral Jackie Fisher</p> </div>
 
M

mattblack

Guest
Yeah, but I thought you had to submit for approval or something? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p>One Percent of Federal Funding For Space: America <strong><em><u>CAN</u></em></strong> Afford it!!  LEO is a <strong><em>Prison</em></strong> -- It's time for a <em><strong>JAILBREAK</strong></em>!!</p> </div>
 
J

john_316

Guest
wow i think bat guanno would have joined the ranks of jeffery bell over at space daily... maybe he really is him... who knows..... <br /><br /><img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /><br /><br />
 
E

elguapoguano

Guest
WHAT!?!<br /><br />Are you talking smack to me, or to our former compadre<br />GayTanMorono? <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font color="#ff0000"><u><em>Don't let your sig line incite a gay thread ;>)</em></u></font> </div>
 
J

john_316

Guest
Chill Elguapoguano! <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /><br /><br />U know who i mean......... "gaetanomarano" that one i always called "bat guanno"<br /><br /><img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" /><br />
 
E

elguapoguano

Guest
kewl kewl, just makin sure bro. <br />I sure am glad that GayTanMorono is gone. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font color="#ff0000"><u><em>Don't let your sig line incite a gay thread ;>)</em></u></font> </div>
 
J

j05h

Guest
>Look up "Bush", or "Kerry", or any major political figure, and notice they have locked out further editing. It got to be a game with people to trash the other guy, and some of the perps were paid employees of people in Washington.<br /><br />Like I wrote, the staffers were trashing wikipedia entries, i'm sure others were as well. Plenty of news about it on Slashdot. <br /><br />wikipedia at least has some edit/moderation - gaetano's material won't last to long. Here on SDC, without user-level moderation, his... diarreal... postings were a real drag on useful discussion. <br /><br />Josh <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div align="center"><em>We need a first generation of pioneers.</em><br /></div> </div>
 
H

heliox

Guest
<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>hadn't seen the bit about congress. That is fascinating!<br /><br />I knew there had been a number of controversial contributions that had come up in the news a couple of months ago... <p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4695376.stm<br /><br />
 
F

frodo1008

Guest
Unfortunately, askold (who was at least more intelligible than gaet) has just re-emerged. His very first post introduced a thread in which he stated that he was totally against the manned space program!!<br /><br />These anti manned program (and therefore anti NASA, shuttle, ISS and VSE) people are almost as persistent as some of the political extremist fanatics over on free space! After awhile you start to feel like you are swimming uphill against a flow of molasses!!<br /><br />Oh well.............<br /><br />To even these people, but especially to the rest of you, Have A Great Day!!!<br />
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts