Here we have the reason why deciding we know everything that we will ever know, or need to know, about what’s out there because the math (i.e. Physics) tells us, so; is a bad idea. No, I am not saying that we should ignore any of the physics: particle, string, the big bang, etc., and you name it.
Those physics can and do provide insights as well as answers to what we can expect and is out there; beyond our ability to explore and analyze. What the article reveals is that we should guard against a natural tendency toward complacency in the belief that we can figure everything out by studying all the available information of today.
A type of complacency that leads far too many of us to conclude that today’s methodology in the study of outer space is the only avenue worth pursuing.
Those physics can and do provide insights as well as answers to what we can expect and is out there; beyond our ability to explore and analyze. What the article reveals is that we should guard against a natural tendency toward complacency in the belief that we can figure everything out by studying all the available information of today.
A type of complacency that leads far too many of us to conclude that today’s methodology in the study of outer space is the only avenue worth pursuing.
Last edited: