Catastrophe's latest activity
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Argument by analogy.Gibsense, As a scientist myself (B.Sc. Hons,, published scientific author (Marcel Dekker and patent holder) I fail to see how "science... -
Catastrophe reacted to Harry Costas's post in the thread Question Infinity or not infinity that is the question. with
Like.
I understand -
Catastrophe reacted to marcin's post in the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason with Like.
I'm really, really glad and thankful that you're here, @Catastrophe
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason.I have explained catalysis in #209. The ABC example covers alignment and orientation - that is the function of C - to produce molecular...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Question Infinity or not infinity that is the question..No. Not at all. Every person or conscious being has its own observable universe, including Persimultivons on planet Allivonterox 15...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Question Infinity or not infinity that is the question..Please note:
-
Catastrophe reacted to marcin's post in the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason with Like.
https://forums.space.com/threads/basic-error-the-accelerating-universe-conclusion-reason.67148/page-9#post-612899 Moreover, if there was...
-
Catastrophe reacted to marcin's post in the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason with Like.
@George² If the temperature is higher, the particles move faster, so they collide and interact more frequently. If there is a catalyst...
-
Catastrophe reacted to marcin's post in the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason with Like.
@Catastrophe Thx for the confirmation :) "If there is a catalyst, it must cause the reactants to interact more frequently, probably by...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason.As a Chemistry B.Sc., my explanation of catalysis is as follows Consider two reactants, A and B, which react to form AB directly only...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason.Just for clarification, Marcin " If there is a catalyst, it must cause the reactants to interact more frequently": correct. "a...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Argument by analogy.I am aware of the following, but I take serious issue with it...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Argument by analogy.This does not mean that the radiation is static. Photons do not stop moving because they are everywhere. They would not get everywhere...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Argument by analogy.Gibsense, we must, as always, watch the semantics. A background can be construed as static, but we are discussing cosmic microwave...
-
Catastrophe replied to the thread Argument by analogy.https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=to+radiate&sca_esv=bbddf6f6e47022e4&sxsrf=AHTn8zq7evhVB8uhZIZ_Sryy87ebwLC2MA%3A1738339588277&source=hp&...
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram