Recent content by Greenlight

Most people think that every black hole must have a singularity, but i do not. I believe that we could be in a black hole. One without a singularity. if so, the hubble constant cannot determine the age of the universe, it only can determine the rate at which our blackhole universe is...

my thought on gravity. matter creates a node in the oscillations of zero point field. and like cymatics experiments show the sand gathers together at the nodes.

perhaps we could we peer into a black hole with a fast enough craft by the same means of additive shift.

is there any indication that Einstein even believed in singularities? Is it his theory of relativity, or the singularity theory that breaks down?

I often hear this but it clashes with my understanding of relativity. Can someone explain how relativity "breaks down" at the event horizon?

if the space part of space/time were expanding then it took those distant planets 13 billion years to get to where they are relative to us, then it will take 13 billion more years for their light to get back to us so that we see it where where we do. But if the time part of space/time is...

Is it because we see back in time to before stars formed and thus there is no more stars beyond that point? or is it because space is expanding at the hubble constant and when you reach the horizon space expands at the speed of light so we cannot see past it?

Light Cone a surface in space-time, represented as a cone in three dimensions, comprising all the points from which a light signal would reach a given point (at the apex) simultaneously, and that therefore appear simultaneous to an observer at the apex. but Einstein concluded that...

depends on what you mean by "we" are "we" still human after we evolve for a few million years?

I think i would measure both ends at the same RPM. and if someone was near the Sun they would measure both ends to be the same but faster than my measurement. The only Helix seen would be that from the 8 min SOL trip. And that light would follow that helix.

i guess im caught up on the "Anyone at any location would see their area perfectly straight." after a million years there will be 60 million winds. yet still look straight? if the lazer is fixed and rotating with the shaft but doesnt follow the helix , how can both look perfectly straight ...

lets point the rod at the Sun the time dilation is ~1 min per year at the surface of the sun. lets say i rotate the shaft at 60 rpm after one year there should be 60 winds in the rod? If you fixed a laser to the shaft and shot a pulse of light down the shaft would it follow that winding...

i can't seem to wrap my head around that. if after one day the top has turned 360 degrees and the bottom 359 degreees after a year the top has made 360 revolutions and the bottom has make 359 at which point if i stop the rotation at the top. does the bottom continue to rotate for another day...

if in a day it appears to twist by a degree, but in a year that time dilation would add up to a full circle. would it break? or would relatively slow end try to catch up making its rotation faster than the top?

A day is a day whether you are at the top of everest or at the bottom. (earth is your spinning rod) but a second is defined differently. and a day at the top of everest doesn't have the same picoseconds as a day at the bottom of everest. So i assume you believe that the second is defined...