Recent content by mdswartz

When I visualize things I don't use words. In fact, I find it difficult to explain in words what I've visualized. Thus, my herky jerky style of writing. Anyone who's read what I wrote would believe me. I visualized black hole interiors, big bangs, falling in all directions into the rest of the...

Niteshft_1, I gave my answer to many of your ideas just a few days ago on a different thread, discerning via the certainties of black hole interiors how the internal pressures of the nucleus grow and grow until the day that critical mass is achieved, leading to a big bang if any more matter is...

lyingbuddha has a point here. If we believe that everything happens naturally, and one-time only unnatural occurrences that can't be explained are unlikely to happen, and that everything we've ever observed in the universe has a natural cause, then wondering if a big bang comes from a black hole...

Regarding the origin, there might be a way to detect the general area. Under a big bang from a black hole, you might see many different kinds of far away galaxies, but gravitating toward 2 extremes: 1. A far away galaxy that was relatively close to the origin of the big bang would be nearly...

There's only 2 things, matter and space, but the really fun stuff is watching what matter does. Matter wields gravity and all the forces to interact with space to make everything we see and experience in the universe and here at home. It's there for our viewing pleasure, for our experiential...

Regarding external forces acting on matter, when your understanding is that the 4 forces only exist in connection with an amount of matter, and are forever inseparable from matter and are therefore a part of matter, and that energy is interchangeable with and is a part of matter, and that things...

Matter is about about space in that all of the most elementary particles and forces remain the same, only how they interact with space changes. The elementary particles and their quantum spin might otherwise spin off into space, but the strong force captures and holds onto a space to allow the...

Sorry Harry, forgot to say I don't know where the point of origin is, but there was one, and you can't tell now because everything looks the same in all directions. But don't forget, everything is pushed back by the force of the blast except the biggest black holes, which are moved much less...

Harry, way above on this thread and months ago I gave some crank science comments about how I believed that big bangs are natural occurrences in the greater universe, and how I viewed it all going down. I don't think it would be right to repeat any of that here. But what I'm implying with this...

The force of the blast results in a pushed back section of the rest of the universe in all directions, except the smbh's are moved much less, and partially hold their relative positions in the new section of universe, and the particles, forces and resultant atomic matter and hydrogen are thrown...

And just like many say there's no escape from a black hole, the real answer is there's no escape from a big bang bubble, which is why we have the speed of light.

There are infinities for real, like infinite universe and eternal universe, but not because math says so. I don't know what math says about the universe. But infinite universe seems more plausible then an edge, and even if eternal universe isn't actually so, it makes more sense than any flimsy...

As a crank science guy myself, I'd appreciate a separate sub-forum, because other sites will permanently ban you just for expressing your truly believed ideas if they're outside of mainstream science. It would be a service to guys like me to provide such a sub-forum, placing you ahead of other...

The essence of black hole formation and feeding is the relinquishing of space. The particles and the forces inside are all the same as they were before, only the space has been relinquished. And the opposite is true, in that the essence of fermion formation is the capture of space, which is held...

One additional note regarding recent Webb observations. The furthest away galaxies seen, and thus viewed at their youngest ages, mostly seem to have much higher proportions of smbh mass versus stellar mass. This is the expected result when the smbh's preceded the big bang, survived the big bang...