Supercritical Black Hole

[niteshft_1]

How massive can a Black Hole be has been questioned for some time. I posit that we just need to look back at the "Big Bang".

We first thought the world was flat....
We were the center of our world and the Sun rotated around us....
We lived in the Milky Way, alone in our universe.....
We discovered many more galaxies and not alone....
We think our universe goes to infinity....

We've given names to our discoveries...world, sun, galaxy and universe, etc.
We've believed that space was void before the Big Bang. But what if it wasn't?

Our universe is an ever expanding bubble that, we may never be able to fully explore.
But how did that bubble form? Before the Big Bang, I believe there were massive universes with massive Black Holes to match.
The thought that space is empty before the Big Bang is false. There are other universes with galaxies and Black Holes everywhere...
some critical and some super-critical.

OK, supercritical Black Hole is 50% or more of Black Hole energy limit.
Critical Black Hole is what is needed for a supercritical Black Hole to reach its limit, to become the "Big Bang". (50.1%+49.9%)

I also posit that as these Black Holes meet and explode into a universe, the outer edge has a massive build up of stars
and galaxies, creating a pull on our universe causing our galaxies to speed up outwards, seeming as they are pushing each other outwards. Is that
what we are mistaking for dark energy/matter?

I wish I was younger and could keep thoughts flowing to memory but alas I cannot. I'm sure some of you will get the gist of my thoughts and expand on it/them.

Bob, aka, niteshft_1

 

[Gibsense]

Black holes shrink. They can't explode.

Actually Hawking said exactly the opposite. Black Holes will explode as Hawking Radiation reduces them to a critical point (involving the Swartzchild Radius I expect). Apparently such explosions have not been observed but on the other hand the shrinking black hole process would take so long that the universe may have ended. I hope I have got that right... But anyway your idea might still apply

 

[Gibsense]

I wish I was younger and could keep thoughts flowing to memory but alas I cannot. I'm sure some of you will get the gist of my thoughts and expand on it/them.

Bob, aka, niteshft_1

Me too,

 

[Fest3er]

Black holes shrink. They can't explode. The Schwarzchild radius is the limit of any observability. According to Stephen Hawkings at any rate. If light can't escape then neither can an explosion. Unless you are talking about higher dimensions or some other twaddle like that 11 dimensional string theory Michio Kaku pushes. Universes expand and stretch until another big bang fills the largely empty void where the last particles sizzled out long before.. or not. We don't know what is beyond the edge of the observable universe but judging from pictures of the early universe from the edge of known space it's likely more of the same out there. Big bangs going off randomly and hopefully far away from here.

I like this concept, that the universe expands until it’s so empty, another Big Bang fills the void. Assuming that even in a cyclic Big Bang/Big Crunch (or Void), there must have been an original Big Bang that started things. Matter and energy would necessarily pop out of nothing (I.e. magic). Such an event could only happen if there is no time, or laws of physics (such as in the nothingness prior to the original Big Bang). In order for it to happen again (following a Big Void), there must be so few events, that time basically stops, and the probability of something (anything) happening approaches infinity.

 

[Gibsense]

I wish I was younger and could keep thoughts flowing to memory but alas I cannot. I'm sure some of you will get the gist of my thoughts and expand on it/them.

You and me both!

 

[niteshft_1]

Our thought of, there isn't enough mass to explain the universe's gravitational pull, is based on the universe being empty at the time of the "Big Bang". What if the Universe wasn't empty? ... What was it like? ... I'm thinking the "Big Bang" vaporized all that was around it and whatever it may have been, It might explain Dark Matter as the results of the explosion hasn't finalized.

 

[niteshft_1]

The "Big Bang" will fill the universe in an instant but matter that surrounded it cannot ever reach that speed. The heat and forces at that moment would tear the fabric of time and space, everything is just a soup of plasma. But matter is left behind in every type imaginable.

 

[Gibsense]

The "Big Bang" will fill the universe in an instant

The Big Bang IS the universe

 

[mdswartz]

Niteshft_1, I gave my answer to many of your ideas just a few days ago on a different thread, discerning via the certainties of black hole interiors how the internal pressures of the nucleus grow and grow until the day that critical mass is achieved, leading to a big bang if any more matter is added . In an earlier thread from Cat titled, "Goodbye Infinity..." I commented several times from May 2024 through December 2024 on several ideas like yours regarding what happens when a big bang explodes from a black hole into the mostly open spaces of the greater universe. I touch on topics you bring up here, like pulverizing the original host galaxy into rubble and heavier elements, pushing back the rest of the universe, leading to our big bang bubble universe within a pushed back section of the rest of the universe, whereby after billions of years the shock wave wanes into a gravitational wave, and is no longer a dominant force, allowing gravity from the pushed back matter in the rest of the universe to help pull our section apart at a faster rate. I go a little further, explaining how supermassive black holes are pushed less, partially hold their positions in the new section of universe, survive the big bang, become anchors for new galaxies, and essentially operate as eternal pillars during one or more big bang events. If you're interested you can click my name and take a look.