Recent content by primpre

It is the outcome that interests me. I am simply proposing in my paper that the two possibilities (real or imaginary) would have the same quantum effect on the reactivity of Precursor.

Hello Cat Firstly, I would like to direct you to the present revision of my paper. In it I have removed all reference to a primary precept (P1) because it was generating erroneous interpretations. It is replace by the first law of universal materialization (UM1). For some reason, when I...

My paper proposes that boundary based expansion may continue indefinitely, though at an ever decreasing rate, with the ongoing exponential decline in the surface/volume ratio of space. Transient condensates don't apply in that circumstance because expansion is occurring at the absolute vacuum...

:)

I have studied the Big Bang theory in sufficient depth to question whether it has to happen instantaneously. Following that question I discovered that the same outcome can evolve in a cold start, slow roll process, perhaps taking millennia, from a point-presence rather than a singularity...

Have a good one.:)

Hello Ignat:) I have presented here a paper that considers the implications of a closed (spherical) universe within which we reside, like the inside surface of a ball. I have considered the prospects of a hot Big Bang vs a cold start, slow roll process and have found that the universe as we...

What you are implying is that radiation has been leaking from the universe from the start and always will. The theory pertaining to the Higgs boson provides for two levels of vacuum- the metastable vacuum that we live in, and the true vacuum to which the Higgs boson can theoretically decay...

I hear ya. It was well above mine when I first took it on. :)

Pardon. I have a somewhat compromised right hand and don't always catch my typos. The word is irrelevant. It naturally takes much longer for a P1 universe to develop because it involves a continuous series of causal feedback loops. In the paper I refer to it as a slow roll process, borrowing...

Not at all. It is just a different theory that brings us to the same end. But I want to correct one part of my response to: ' It may not assume the energy density of a classic BB universe until somewhere around nucleosynthesis.' The time it takes is immaterial under P1 theory. :)

Actually a P1 universe is always in a state of inflation on a hyperbolic curve, as explained in the text. The time frame of expansion is much slower though, but it is still exponential. It may not assume the expansion rate of a classic BB universe until somewhere around nucleosynthesis...

What a welcome! But thank you.:) I can't speak for metaphysics, but thank you for pointing that out. If I understand you correctly, I can only say that Big Bang theory does not presume that cosmic inflation starts directly from a singularity. The size of the universe at the time of inflation has...

Well, Claudio, that is quite a project, especially considering that we haven't even found a graviton yet. Good luck with it, though. prmpre :)