It is sad that some people like to publicly attack others. But, it seems that is profitable. See "What is rage-baiting and why is it profitable?"
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gp555xy5ro
That said, the whole article seems to be more about profit and propaganda than actual science or real news. It doesn't really seem that "rare" to be the hundredth person of a particular gender, race, religion or whatever to have done something. So, how is this event really any different from the 99th or the (upcoming?) 101st?
The only difference that I see is that Ms. Calandrelli is an "astronaut, MIT engineer, bestselling author, TV host and STEM influencer." And, she is using this event, much like a "stunt", to attract the attention she wants for herself and perhaps her "causes".
And, even this negative type publicity actually helps her personally in that regard, gaining her more attention and substantial empathy, too.
But, it probably does have a negative effect on those viewers who are female and that she is hoping to influence into going into STEM carriers.
If we are really serious about creating colonies of humans off-Earth, we are going to need some women who are capable
and willing.