3rd (possible) CLV problem: too much "G" for crew?

[gaetanomarano]

<br />no... there are... but countries' army have more power than science... so, if these countries will have a "one free ticket to the moon", the highest probability is that it will be an experienced and multi-decorated top-gun of their glorious air force (do you not think it's true?)

 

[rubicondsrv]

Getano please stop posting your repetive talking points. <br /><br />You have sucessfully driven at least two good members away with your rantings. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[gaetanomarano]

<br />I've seen on uplink some (professional?) "propaganda & insult" men that posts insults and bad images (not only against me!) but NEVER I've said them (and NEVER I will say them) to don't post their (bad and useless) "opinions" or to "go away" from here!<br /><br />it's called "FREEDOM" ...probably someone can explain to you what this word mean...<br /><br />if you don't like to read, talk and post about "G", CEV dimensions, rockets' costs and ideas... you can read and post ONLY in some excellent "scientific" threads here about trolls, sperm, puppies, pies in the sky and diarreah...<br /><br />but, since I'm for FREEDOM... the freedom of ALL peoples... I will NEVER ask moderators to lock any thread (like they have done with some of my "disliked arguments" threads... that have MORE VIEWS than OPEN puppies' thread...)

 

[gaetanomarano]

<br />great part of engineers' science is related to engineering (new materials, new chips, etc.) not to "search the unknown" (in space and on earth)<br /><br />also, many multi-discipline thinkers and scientist are (and will remain) on earth... I'm not talking of them here but of "scientists on the moon"<br /><br />I don't think these scientists may have the time (and the top-guns' practice of flight/spaceflight) to be also EXCELLENT space-pilots of complex machines like CEV/LSAM and complex missions<br /><br />to be SAFE (and come back on earth with all astronauts ALIVE) each moon mission MUST have<br /><br />- one CEV pilot/specialist<br /><br />- one LSAM pilot/specialist<br /><br />- one CEV/LSAM second pilot/emergency specialist<br /><br />- one scientist (or international host)<br /><br />I don't think we will see more than 5-10 scientists ON THE MOON in next 20 years (and for a few weeks only...)<br />

 

[gaetanomarano]

<br />when I've proposed to explore the (ENTIRE!) moon surface with hundreds moonrovers (instead of a few astronauts for a few weeks to explore a few miles) the main critic I've received was that "moon missions are for science and science NEED the PRESENCE of SCIENTISTS on the moon... NOT moonrovers" (or earth-assisted "human-moonrovers"...)<br /><br />the plan you expose (search and use moon resources, etc.) will be possible over 30 years away from now and with MANY and BIG vehicles and lunar-hardware<br /><br />with the little "LSAM-can" (and only a few more space per astronaut than LEM) the ONLY real purpose of moon missions MUST be SCIENCE... and SCIENCE absolutely NEED the PRESENCE of TRUE scientists ON THE MOON... NOT excellent (but only earth-assisted) pilots<br /><br />this is my opinion