I introduce a new atomic structure based on a deterministic atomic model founded on Augmented Newtonian Dynamics (AND), a classical framework that reinstates causality at the heart of atomic behavior. The AND model directly challenges the central assumptions of quantum theory; particularly the notions of spontaneous emission, wavefunction collapse, and probabilistic transitions — by proposing a structured, ordered mechanism underlying atomic interactions.
A key insight of this approach is the replacement of spontaneity with order. Quantum mechanics maintains that electrons make spontaneous "jumps" between discrete energy levels, emitting photons in unpredictable and probabilistic ways. However, this intrinsic randomness is fundamentally incompatible with many modern physical systems. Technologies such as optical atomic clocks, which depend on photon emissions at precisely defined frequencies in the hundreds of terahertz, and semiconductor-based processors and quantum circuits, which operate deterministically in the gigahertz range, require a much more reliable and continuous mode of electron-photon interaction than quantum theory can provide.
The AND model addresses this inconsistency by proposing that real photon emission is not a spontaneous event but an ordered, directional, and nearly instantaneous process, occurring only under well-defined energy conditions, such as when an unpaired electron absorbs energy from an external source. In contrast, the continuous regulation of an electron’s energy in a stable orbital is maintained through the rapid exchange of virtual photons, one emission followed by almost instantaneous reabsorption, taking place every orbit of the nucleus or at the rate of hundreds of trillions of times per second, but unlike in the case of real photon emissions these virtual photon interactions take place in random directions. These virtual interactions do not involve the emission of detectable radiation but serve as a self-stabilizing mechanism that preserves energy equilibrium within the atom. This process of virtual photon interactions effectively replaces wave-particle duality as the reason for electron stability around the nucleus, and brings the stability of the atom into line with the stability of the nucleus. Real photon interactions, when they do occur, follow classical laws of physics —specifically, the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. The re-emitted photons are not scattered randomly but propagate in a structured manner, forming lines or rays of identical, connected photons. This orderly propagation explains the rectilinear motion of light and accounts for the inverse square law observed in the distribution of light intensity.
Within this model, electrons are treated as solid particles rather than probabilistic wave-functions. Their orbits are simple and well-defined—circular or slightly elliptical—contrasting sharply with the abstract orbital shapes predicted by quantum mechanics. Echoing principles of classical physics, electrons are arranged in discrete, symmetrical shells around the nucleus, their positions determined by the need to counterbalance the positive nuclear charge through electrostatic attraction. The atomic shells are divided as in quantum mechanics by division into sub-shells and orbitals with the number of electrons in each orbital governed by the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Real photon exchange is limited to orbitals containing unpaired electrons, while paired electrons remain inert with respect to photon interactions. Internal energy stabilization is achieved not through abstract quantum fields but via continuous interactions with virtual photons. In this view, photons themselves are not quantum field excitations, but structured dipoles composed of polarized pulses of electric energy, emitted directly from the electron as part of its self-regulating behavior.
The implications of this model are far-reaching. Spectral lines emerge not as probabilistic results of uncertain energy states but as deterministic consequences of exact energy matching between incident photons and the atomic system. The structured and directional nature of photon propagation explains both the rectilinear motion of light and its conformity to the inverse square law. By offering a causally complete and locally governed account of both emission and absorption, AND theory provides a conceptual foundation that is not only more aligned with classical principles but also far better suited to the needs of ultra-fast, precision technologies in use today.
A key insight of this approach is the replacement of spontaneity with order. Quantum mechanics maintains that electrons make spontaneous "jumps" between discrete energy levels, emitting photons in unpredictable and probabilistic ways. However, this intrinsic randomness is fundamentally incompatible with many modern physical systems. Technologies such as optical atomic clocks, which depend on photon emissions at precisely defined frequencies in the hundreds of terahertz, and semiconductor-based processors and quantum circuits, which operate deterministically in the gigahertz range, require a much more reliable and continuous mode of electron-photon interaction than quantum theory can provide.
The AND model addresses this inconsistency by proposing that real photon emission is not a spontaneous event but an ordered, directional, and nearly instantaneous process, occurring only under well-defined energy conditions, such as when an unpaired electron absorbs energy from an external source. In contrast, the continuous regulation of an electron’s energy in a stable orbital is maintained through the rapid exchange of virtual photons, one emission followed by almost instantaneous reabsorption, taking place every orbit of the nucleus or at the rate of hundreds of trillions of times per second, but unlike in the case of real photon emissions these virtual photon interactions take place in random directions. These virtual interactions do not involve the emission of detectable radiation but serve as a self-stabilizing mechanism that preserves energy equilibrium within the atom. This process of virtual photon interactions effectively replaces wave-particle duality as the reason for electron stability around the nucleus, and brings the stability of the atom into line with the stability of the nucleus. Real photon interactions, when they do occur, follow classical laws of physics —specifically, the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. The re-emitted photons are not scattered randomly but propagate in a structured manner, forming lines or rays of identical, connected photons. This orderly propagation explains the rectilinear motion of light and accounts for the inverse square law observed in the distribution of light intensity.
Within this model, electrons are treated as solid particles rather than probabilistic wave-functions. Their orbits are simple and well-defined—circular or slightly elliptical—contrasting sharply with the abstract orbital shapes predicted by quantum mechanics. Echoing principles of classical physics, electrons are arranged in discrete, symmetrical shells around the nucleus, their positions determined by the need to counterbalance the positive nuclear charge through electrostatic attraction. The atomic shells are divided as in quantum mechanics by division into sub-shells and orbitals with the number of electrons in each orbital governed by the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Real photon exchange is limited to orbitals containing unpaired electrons, while paired electrons remain inert with respect to photon interactions. Internal energy stabilization is achieved not through abstract quantum fields but via continuous interactions with virtual photons. In this view, photons themselves are not quantum field excitations, but structured dipoles composed of polarized pulses of electric energy, emitted directly from the electron as part of its self-regulating behavior.
The implications of this model are far-reaching. Spectral lines emerge not as probabilistic results of uncertain energy states but as deterministic consequences of exact energy matching between incident photons and the atomic system. The structured and directional nature of photon propagation explains both the rectilinear motion of light and its conformity to the inverse square law. By offering a causally complete and locally governed account of both emission and absorption, AND theory provides a conceptual foundation that is not only more aligned with classical principles but also far better suited to the needs of ultra-fast, precision technologies in use today.
Last edited:
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram