M
mikeemmert
Guest
<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>...nitrous oxide. I was under the impression that that was primarily a transient state, at least for combustion products in fuel combustion streams, as hydrogen has a higher affinity for the oxygen than nitrogen does.<p><hr /></p></p></blockquote>...nit<b><font color="yellow">ric</font></b><font color="white"> oxide. Anyway, your impression is the same as mine, it's a transient product, the LOX/air reaction cools the compressor cone. 2 H2 + 2 NO = H2O + N2. Nitric oxide is actually a stronger oxidizer than oxygen, oxygen burns in NO as the fuel.<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>... I don't see this as affecting ground level smog interactions.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">???*~<font color="white">...<img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" /> <br /><br />Anyways, I don't see us flying more than 50-100 sorties a year at best, so I'd point the protesters<p><hr /></p></font></font></p></blockquote>Nah, pointing protesters is like herding cats.<br /><br />You got the wrong guy, dude. My protests concern warfare between human tribes and are confined to Free Space, where they are vociferous and eloquent. You are still thinking nuke protesters, and I <i>told</i> you, they use all kinds of pseudoscience. These guys showed me they were idiots.</font>