I like your sig, pyoko. It's quirky. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /><br /><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>Assume the asteroid is already as close as the Moon. <p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />As close as the Moon? The appropriate course of action in this circumstance is:<br /><br />1) Find a sheltered spot indoors, away from windows.<br />2) Sit down and put your head between your knees.<br />3) Bend waaaaay over and....<br />4) ...kiss your butt goodbye.<br /><br />I seriously doubt that even if we could deliver all of the nukes on Earth to the asteroid in time we could significantly deflect its course this way. At best, we might slightly adjust the aim point. Then again, it really depends on the mass of the object. The more massive it is, the more it will take to deflect it. It's possible it would be small enough for this to work, especially to explain why it could have gone undetected until it was so close.<br /><br />Being an engineer, I'm caught thinking about delivery. A nice big cluster of nukes is going to be a pretty heavy payload, although we can save mass by breaking it up into many flights. Guidance will be an issue as well. We'll want to make sure this hits its target on the first try, because every nuke has got to count. The delivery problem is likely insurmountable with currently availble equipment in the timeframe suggested by an object already as close as the Moon. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>