Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason

[Catastrophe]

PS Another point I did not answer was how a 2D mathematician could calculate 3D issues. You challenged the idea that a 2d person could perceive an orthogonal direction by saying that volumes were out of their conception.

A pertinent point but a plain would be within their imaginations. The idea that a plain intersects its own plain at 90 degrees is feasible. It would start as a dot then a line increasing in length as it intersects and then declining until it disappears. They would lack the full description of an intersection of a sphere but would be able to ascertain basic principles.

We were both correct

plain versus plane - Google Suche

Cat

 

[Gibsense]

Plain v Plane ; Thanks

 

[Harry Costas]

Interesting link

- YouTube

Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

search.app

 

[Atlan0001]

It can't be rotated the way they rotate it in the YouTube video. The EM time curvature within SPACE disallows the picture to be a picture of such singular objects and orientations. The motions over SPACETIME's millions to billions of past-future histories would be a strange attractor of chaos making it a many sided particle that would be many different particles from each side of the many sides observed. Several different universes in one SPACE, impossible to map.

Thus, as the saying goes, that map is not the territory and can never be the territory.