Could black hole jets be due to gravitationally accelerated dark matter changing state to dark energy and giving off heat? Ie hot water to steam when the pressure is lowered.
Had you thought that the green might have come from the glass?It was a green piece of glass during an eclipse
Re: "Dark energy can also condense into dark matter."Dark matter was always the biggest portion of the universe.
Stars and black holes also convert matter to dark matter.
When dark matter converts to dark energy. Energy released.
This happens when it is out of a gravity well or it’s EQUIVALENT.
Dark energy can also condense into dark matter. Energy required.
EQUIVALENT can happen almost anywhere with the right combination
of gravity and velocity nano flares happen.
Is that not equivalent to saying that one suspects that the latent heat of condensation of steam will be calculated before we actually know what water is?The latent heat of condensation is currently unknown but I suspect it will be calculated before we actually know what dark matter actually is.
Are we talking physical chemistry (at which I am qualified to comment) or some unknown stuff about some unknown process happening to an unknown 'something or other' in an unknown manner? In what way do you recognize condensation of any form of energy into some state of matter, especially if you cannot recognize either the start or finish 'material'? I am lost here.With the right data from a liquid changing state you could identify what the liquid is.
"I have a high certainty about dark matter not existing, dark energy might be related to spacetime. "I disagree with the existence of dark matter but the effects of dark energy do seem to coincide with some of the odder properties of spacetime (under certain conditions).
(Arg 1) The inertial field of a moving mass creates faster time rate at its leading edge and a slower time at its trailing edge (could be backwards).
(Arg 2) Unlike electric charges the minimum energy state is where like time rates are closer to each other than unlike rates of time.
(Arg 3) Jets and accretion disks are linked. As the density of the accretion disk increases the individual inertial fields will reconfigure to a lower energy state where the top and bottom surfaces of the accretion disk take opposite time rates. The inertial field is now at right angles to the accretion disk causing matter to separate from the disk and move away as jets.
(Arg 4) The material in the accretion disk which has now expelled its kinetic energy (through the jets) is now free to fall into the Star or Blackhole. Kinetic energy must be lost by a mass to fall into a protostar. Individual planets are exactly that, without the velocities and densities of an accretion disk the effect is not observed so planetary orbits are stable.
I have a high certainty about dark matter not existing, dark energy might be related to spacetime.
Grrrrrr!Are they not related by Dark ( E = mc^2 )?
Of course, I am talking mass and energy, not energy and spacetime.
The information I have learned from recent astrophysicists is that 72% of the Universe is dark energy, 23% is dark matter, and 5% is made up of known particles (atoms). Where do you get your statement that “the majority of the Universe has always been made up of dark matter”? (I think this was Ed Stauffer’s statement.)Re: "Dark energy can also condense into dark matter."
What is the latent heat of condensation?
The information I have learned from recent astrophysicists is that 72% of the Universe is dark energy, 23% is dark matter, and 5% is made up of known particles (atoms). Where do you get your statement that “the majority of the Universe has always been made up of dark matter”? (I think this was Ed Stauffer’s statement.)Re: "Dark energy can also condense into dark matter."
What is the latent heat of condensation?