From yesterday's NASA press release:<br /><br />"This is not the same white-knuckle situation we had during Saturn orbit insertion, but there are some things we can't control," said Earl Maize, deputy project manager for the Cassini-Huygens mission at JPL. "If a spacecraft anomaly should occur, or if the weather at the tracking stations does not cooperate, the science return may be limited or lost. Although this is an unlikely scenario, the possibility still exists." <b> Cassini will have only one opportunity to send the data back to Earth before the data are overwritten on the recorders by data from the next set of observations. </b> The first downlink of data by NASA's Deep Space Network occurs at 6:30 p.m. PDT. <br /><br /><br />WHAT?<br /><br />If this is indeed the last of the Battlestar Galactica class probes, I find it exceptionally dumb that there's no backup plan for storing data collected during the Ta encounter. What if something happens at Madrid? Is the memory on Cassini so tight that they can't store everything in the event there's a pointing issue, bad weather at Madrid, power outage in Pasadena? Heck, the MER's have quite a bit of memory and have been storing GIGS of data before downloading parts of it.<br /><br />Of course, I just realized that this thing was built in 1996. Hard drives were pretty small... Anyone know the capacity of the SSR arrays? I'm wondering if they're really going to fill these all up completely, to the point that the next information gathering period would be destructive...<br /><br />Is it possible that the press release may be an overstatement ? Some of the documentation I have seen suggests that Cassini can and will be transmitting up to 4 gigs a day... it seems to me that if I was planning a 760 mile flyby of Titan I would probably max out my observations, but whatever observations they make post-flyby cannot possibly contain the same amount of data, or so logic would suggest.<br /><br />Further, I've been unable to locate any detaile