<font color="yellow">"I thought the only direct surface measurements were from the radar?"</font><br /><br />The best images, showing the most detail -- possible lakes, flows, fractures, etc. -- are from radar. But these cover a very small portion (1%) of Titans surface. Although a certain amount of detail is seen in the radar images, there is really no good way to interpret what is being seen. This is where the Huygens images will be of immense value. No radar images have been made of the Huygens landing site yet, but I'm sure there will be. <br /><br />The images showing large, continent-size, light and dark areas covering Titan, are not radar images. They show little detail and, strangely, so far, remote sensing shows little compositional difference between the light and dark areas. So how do they differ? Here again, Huygens may be a big help. It looks like Huygens will have both light and dark areas in its view as it descends. Possibly its images and other remote observations will help tell the physical differences between the light and dark areas.<br /><br /><br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>