Center of the Universe Located by Triangulation of NASA Data

[cjsven]

Center of the Universe Located by Triangulation of NASA Data 9/25/10 Abstract:

The Very Well Scrubbed NASA’s seven year accumulation of CMB Data is not homogeneous, but has a unique geography. NASA’s overall results have remained the same noting that every CMB point is unchanging; the composite study is like a unique fingerprint. As a result of this work, each point on the CMB sphere can be catalogued; characteristics and coordinates noted. With this information in hand one may use these points in locating earth vis-à-vis the technique of triangulation.

Expanded treatment and references of this study is available at my web site:
http://www.allnewuniverse.com/Center-by ... lation.pdf
*http://www.allnewuniverse.com/DemoOfDarkEnergy.pdf
Charles Sven’s Conference Schedule/Public talks at
http://www.allnewuniverse.com/charles-s ... edule.html

 

[SpeedFreek]

Interesting. I had a look at your pdf, and you seem to be suggesting that the Earth is very close to the "epicentre" of the Big-Bang and the reason we are not right at the centre is due to our peculiar velocity of 600 km/s with regard to that centre - is this a coincidence?

I only ask because the mainstream view is that there is no centre of expansion or epicentre to the Big-Bang, but any observer comoving with the Hubble flow would think they are at the centre of the universe, and it is assumed that the rest frame of the CMBR is the comoving frame. So, our peculiar velocity relative to that frame (600 km/s) is what causes the CMBR anisotropy for us.

The comoving frame, in respect to us, is the centre of the observable universe, but we already knew that. But we assume that anybody, anywhere in the universe, when they subtract their own peculiar velocity from the local comoving frame, would find the universe expands equally in all directions, just as we do.

 

[silylene]

Interesting. I had a look at your pdf, and you seem to be suggesting that the Earth is very close to the "epicentre" of the Big-Bang and the reason we are not right at the centre is due to our peculiar velocity of 600 km/s with regard to that centre - is this a coincidence?

I only ask because the mainstream view is that there is no centre of expansion or epicentre to the Big-Bang, but any observer comoving with the Hubble flow would think they are at the centre of the universe, and it is assumed that the rest frame of the CMBR is the comoving frame. So, our peculiar velocity relative to that frame (600 km/s) is what causes the CMBR anisotropy for us.

The comoving frame, in respect to us, is the centre of the observable universe, but we already knew that. But we assume that anybody, anywhere in the universe, when they subtract their own peculiar velocity from the local comoving frame, would find the universe expands equally in all directions, just as we do.

Yes. Since the universe expands equally in all directions from any observer, than all observers are in the center of their observable universe.

 

[acsinnz]

Gents
If we are at the centre of our universe then the furtherist red shift should be equal in all directions. What we want to know is in which direction [if any] is there a blue shift area visible??
CliveS

 

[silylene]

Gents
If we are at the centre of our universe then the furtherist red shift should be equal in all directions. What we want to know is in which direction [if any] is there a blue shift area visible??
CliveS

You need to correct for our velocity vector.

 

[SpeedFreek]

If we are at the centre of our universe then the furtherist red shift should be equal in all directions.

If we subtract our own peculiar velocity relative to the CMBR, then redshift is equal in all directions.

What we want to know is in which direction [if any] is there a blue shift area visible??

There is no area of the sky that shows an overall blueshift - everything beyond our local supercluster shows a redshift.

 

[robnissen]

Gents
If we are at the centre of our universe then the furtherist red shift should be equal in all directions.

That statement is only true because "the furtherist [?] red shift [is] equal in all directions." To use the balloon analogy, every point on an expanding balloon appears to be receding from every other point. Thus all points on the balloon, or the visible universe would have the "furtherist red shift equal in all directions."

As far as the original post, we appear to be centered because the visible universe by definition is how far we can see. Since we can see equally far in all directions, it would appear that we are at the center of the universe. The flaw in that thinking is that there is NO evidence whatsover that the visible universe equals the entire universe.