The fuel isn't just for course corrections; it's also for attitude control. The Pioneers were spin-stabilized (technically, they still are even though they aren't responding to Earth anymore) but the Voyagers weren't. To orient their instruments at scientific targets and to point their high gain antennas towards Earth, they must burn propellant. This is why the Voyagers continue to consume propellant even though they are no longer trying to maintain any particular course.<br /><br />But in answer to your question, yes, they did burn propellant for what are technically called trajectory correction maneuvers. These were not because the locations of the planets were unknown or unpredictable, however. It was to set up exactly the right approach to each planet so that the spacecraft would encounter the planet just right. The angle needed to propel the spacecraft on to its next target is very precise, and odds are the previous encounter won't set it up that perfectly. Additionally, there were specific targets of interest for each planetary flyby -- especially moons and rings. Sometimes these were decided after the spacecraft were launched. The only way to set these up after the fact is to burn propellant.<br /><br />Really, the remarkable precision of the missions is a magnificent demonstration of how accurate traditional Newtonian celestial mechanics is at most scales.<br /><br />Mission scientists have continued to observe the spacecraft in hopes of seeing a gravitational deflection from a previously unknown object. Additionally, an unexplained deceleration may have been observed in Pioneer 10. (The significance of the data is debated.) Unfortunately, Pioneer 11 gave out too early to confirm the finding, and the Voyagers, as they are not spin-stabilized, do not provide accurate enough data to reproduce the result. If this effect is real, it's not likely to be due to chaos theory in and of itself; something has to be causing it. Theories have ranged from denser- <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>