Unbelievable. Do you realise that first you need spacetime with its points to travel between them?
Sequence of what? Events? Points? I'm still asking what are A and B in case of your proto-time.
Why did you repeat A to B transition a couple of times? Does something vanishes at B and appears at A again or does it oscillate between A and B?
In your case the Words Are and Nothing Becomes.
Unanswered questions:
- How do time intervals reflect and from what?
- Is ai.viXra.org (launched in March 2025) your site?
I am trying to explain something through narrative form. If you want exact formulations please reference the framework that I have provided. Within the reference to my narrative A and B are just references to motion. I think we can agree that something moving will pass through A point and then a different point B as it moves along some path. This is a bit abstract, because yes to actually have tangible points bounded time would have to exist first.
My repeating A->B is just a literary mechanism to indicate recursive behavior. Again this is me attempting to provide a digestible narrative. If you would like to review exact formulations I suggest you review the theory in its current comprehensive form.
viXra is a scientific journal archive. I don't maintain this site. Anyone can submit scientific articles and get a timestamped record for public access. This protects authorship while providing free access to anyone.
- How do time intervals reflect and from what?
This is a good question. The electron is the first particle to come into existence based on the characteristics of that particle.
The Electron and the Recursive Interval
For the
electron, the recursive interval can be inferred from its
rest energy and its
Compton wavelength, since this is where recursive bounded motion becomes minimally self-sustaining.
Known Physical Values:
- Electron mass:
me≈9.11×10−31 kgm_e \approx 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \, \text{kg}me≈9.11×10−31kg
- Rest energy:
E=mec2≈8.187×10−14 JE = m_e c^2 \approx 8.187 \times 10^{-14} \, \text{J}E=mec2≈8.187×10−14J
- Compton wavelength:
λC=hmec≈2.426×10−12 m\lambda_C = \frac{h}{m_e c} \approx 2.426 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{m}λC=mech≈2.426×10−12m
- Characteristic time (Compton interval):
tC=λCc≈8.093×10−21 st_C = \frac{\lambda_C}{c} \approx 8.093 \times 10^{-21} \, \text{s}tC=cλC≈8.093×10−21s
UMT Interpretation
Within UMT, the
recursive interval at the emergence of the electron is equivalent to the
Compton interval:
trecursive(e)≈8.1×10−21 seconds\boxed{t_{\text{recursive}}^{(e)} \
approx 8.1 \times 10^{-21} \, \text{seconds}}trecursive(e)≈8.1×10−21seconds
This represents the
minimal curvature-closed time loop required to stabilize an electron as a persistent structure. It reflects the
self-sustaining recursive rhythm that defines its being.
- Why this interval?
- At this scale, space is curved just enough by the bound energy density to sustain recursive motion.
- The Compton scale avoids gravitational collapse (as in black holes) while supporting consistent motion.
Implications Under UMT
- All particle emergence is recursive motion bounded by curvature.
- Each particle has a unique recursive interval, determined by its rest mass and local curvature configuration.
- The electron’s recursive interval becomes a benchmark—the smallest stable recursive structure in UMT’s framework.
The electron follows the Compton Interval closely because it is a stable particle without any other structure. This interval does not apply so cleanly to other particles that either have some other structural interaction, (protons, neutrons) or are unstable(muons, taus).
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram