D
dreada5
Guest
http://space.com/scienceastronomy/070129_underground_mars.html<br /><br /><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p> Other potential sites to dig for life are young craters, the researchers say. The exposed rock in craters is denser than the ice that covers much of the planet, and it provides better shielding against space radiation than ice. As a result, life might be able to survive closer to the surface. Another bonus of excavating in craters is that most of the vertical digging work would already be done.<br /><br />“In effect, the meteorites dug tens of meters deep for you,” Dartnell said. <p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />After reading the following article was wondering aren't craters the ideal location for establishing permanent bases?<br /><br />Although deep enough, I don't know if typical craters are small enough so that they could be realistically filled with regolith to cover modules etc.<br /><br />Supposedly boring/digging into the side wall of a crater would negate the need to move/cover the hab modules with regolith? Maybe a simpler process?