Dark Matter...WTH?

[DrRocket]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Er, technically the only "assertion" I made was that your statement was false and GR does not "predict" a "bang". You never provided any emprical "science" to support your claim that GR theory predicts a 'bang.&nbsp; It was *your* assertion, not mine.&nbsp; The only way a "bang" is going to occur is *if* gravity is no longer the primary force of nature. <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>You made several assertions.&nbsp; They are noted in my post.</p><p>Specific questions were posed in my post.&nbsp; And solid references were provided for the mainstream positions, including the FACT that models based on general relativity predict the Big Bang.</p><p>The questions are all there. So is the scientific basis for them&nbsp; RESPOND if you can.<br /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[DrRocket]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Er, technically the only "assertion" I made was that your statement was false and GR does not "predict" a "bang". You never provided any emprical "science" to support your claim that GR theory predicts a 'bang.&nbsp; It was *your* assertion, not mine.&nbsp; The only way a "bang" is going to occur is *if* gravity is no longer the primary force of nature. <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>You made several assertions.&nbsp; They are noted in my post.</p><p>Specific questions were posed in my post.&nbsp; And solid references were provided for the mainstream positions, including the FACT that models based on general relativity predict the Big Bang.</p><p>The questions are all there. So is the scientific basis for them&nbsp; RESPOND if you can.<br /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[DrRocket]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Er, technically the only "assertion" I made was that your statement was false and GR does not "predict" a "bang". You never provided any emprical "science" to support your claim that GR theory predicts a 'bang.&nbsp; It was *your* assertion, not mine.&nbsp; The only way a "bang" is going to occur is *if* gravity is no longer the primary force of nature. <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>You made several assertions.&nbsp; They are noted in my post.</p><p>Specific questions were posed in my post.&nbsp; And solid references were provided for the mainstream positions, including the FACT that models based on general relativity predict the Big Bang.</p><p>The questions are all there. So is the scientific basis for them&nbsp; RESPOND if you can.<br /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>You made several assertions.&nbsp; They are noted in my post.Specific questions were posed in my post.&nbsp; And solid references were provided for the mainstream positions, including the FACT that models based on general relativity predict the Big Bang.The questions are all there. So is the scientific basis for them&nbsp; RESPOND if you can. <br />Posted by DrRocket</DIV></p><p><br />And the clock is ticking</p><p>Meteor Wayne, with Mod Hat</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>You made several assertions.&nbsp; They are noted in my post.Specific questions were posed in my post.&nbsp; And solid references were provided for the mainstream positions, including the FACT that models based on general relativity predict the Big Bang.The questions are all there. So is the scientific basis for them&nbsp; RESPOND if you can. <br />Posted by DrRocket</DIV></p><p><br />And the clock is ticking</p><p>Meteor Wayne, with Mod Hat</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>You made several assertions.&nbsp; They are noted in my post.Specific questions were posed in my post.&nbsp; And solid references were provided for the mainstream positions, including the FACT that models based on general relativity predict the Big Bang.The questions are all there. So is the scientific basis for them&nbsp; RESPOND if you can. <br />Posted by DrRocket</DIV></p><p><br />And the clock is ticking</p><p>Meteor Wayne, with Mod Hat</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>You made several assertions.&nbsp; They are noted in my post.Specific questions were posed in my post.&nbsp; And solid references were provided for the mainstream positions, including the FACT that models based on general relativity predict the Big Bang.The questions are all there. So is the scientific basis for them&nbsp; RESPOND if you can. <br />Posted by DrRocket</DIV></p><p><br />And the clock is ticking</p><p>Meteor Wayne, with Mod Hat</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>And the clock is tickingMeteor Wayne, with Mod Hat <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>The clock is ticking on what?</p><p>What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? </p><p>More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? </p><p>GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.</p><p>FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>And the clock is tickingMeteor Wayne, with Mod Hat <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>The clock is ticking on what?</p><p>What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? </p><p>More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? </p><p>GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.</p><p>FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>And the clock is tickingMeteor Wayne, with Mod Hat <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>The clock is ticking on what?</p><p>What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? </p><p>More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? </p><p>GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.</p><p>FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>And the clock is tickingMeteor Wayne, with Mod Hat <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>The clock is ticking on what?</p><p>What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? </p><p>More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? </p><p>GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.</p><p>FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The clock is ticking on what?What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>Mod Hat On</p><p><br />Let me make it clearer.</p><p>The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.</p><p>In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.</p><p>Mod Hat Off</p><p>Wayne</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The clock is ticking on what?What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>Mod Hat On</p><p><br />Let me make it clearer.</p><p>The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.</p><p>In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.</p><p>Mod Hat Off</p><p>Wayne</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The clock is ticking on what?What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>Mod Hat On</p><p><br />Let me make it clearer.</p><p>The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.</p><p>In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.</p><p>Mod Hat Off</p><p>Wayne</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The clock is ticking on what?What exactly are you two claiming made all that matter just go "bang" one fine day?&nbsp; The gravitational field around that object would have been *huge*.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What made it go "bang" in your opinion, and how dd anything get beyond the event horizon? More importantly, what emprical experiment can you cite for us, which has *any* sort of control mechanism, that validates your position? GR theory as Einstein taught it is nothing like Lambda-CDM theory.FYI, rather than hijack this particular thread, and to get to the actual issue here of what constitutes an "explanation", I have started a whole new thread on this topic.&nbsp; If you expect me to answer your questions Wayne, you'll have to start by answering a few of mine.&nbsp; I can't read you mind, nor do I have any clue what you personally think made all that matter go "bang". <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV></p><p>Mod Hat On</p><p><br />Let me make it clearer.</p><p>The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.</p><p>In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.</p><p>Mod Hat Off</p><p>Wayne</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Mod Hat OnLet me make it clearer.The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.Mod Hat OffWayne&nbsp; <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Mod Hat OnLet me make it clearer.The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.Mod Hat OffWayne&nbsp; <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Mod Hat OnLet me make it clearer.The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.Mod Hat OffWayne&nbsp; <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Mod Hat OnLet me make it clearer.The big bang is NOT the subject of this thread. Though you were not the first to bring up the subject, you have driven the "derail Train" off the cliff. The Big Bang is not related to dark matter, so further discussions of the subject in this thread are off-topic.In order to save the thread, my intention is to go back and delete the discussions that are off topic. I'll give you some time to go back and save any brilliant repartee you want to.Mod Hat OffWayne&nbsp; <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV><br /><br />OK, thanks for your cooperation. It does let you off the hook from having to respond to Dr R, but I'd rather save the thread. I hope you understand Dr Rocket.</p><p>Wayne</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV><br /><br />OK, thanks for your cooperation. It does let you off the hook from having to respond to Dr R, but I'd rather save the thread. I hope you understand Dr Rocket.</p><p>Wayne</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV><br /><br />OK, thanks for your cooperation. It does let you off the hook from having to respond to Dr R, but I'd rather save the thread. I hope you understand Dr Rocket.</p><p>Wayne</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>My whole intent of starting the other thread was to prevent this thread from being hijacked any further.&nbsp; The only post of any mine of any "merit" IMO was the first one I made to this thread about the distinction between "MACHO" types of dark matter and other "non-baryonic" hypothetical SUSY particles.&nbsp; The rest of the "repartee" with DrRocket is off topic and I don't personally care what you do with it. <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV><br /><br />OK, thanks for your cooperation. It does let you off the hook from having to respond to Dr R, but I'd rather save the thread. I hope you understand Dr Rocket.</p><p>Wayne</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>OK, thanks for your cooperation. It does let you off the hook from having to respond to Dr R, but I'd rather save the thread. I hope you understand Dr Rocket.Wayne <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>I think DrRocket and I are off to a better start in the new thread anyway.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>

 

[michaelmozina]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>OK, thanks for your cooperation. It does let you off the hook from having to respond to Dr R, but I'd rather save the thread. I hope you understand Dr Rocket.Wayne <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>I think DrRocket and I are off to a better start in the new thread anyway.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>