As adastragrl (Elizabeth) says, the crater may not be in the sun light part of the nucleus. And given the 41 hour rotation, it won't rotate significantly in the small time when the images are large enough to see details.<br /><br />The approach speed is not changeable by a significant amount.<br /><br />The "season" on Tempel 1 may be determinable, so we could rule OUT the crater being illuminated. <br /><br />However, the rotation period is not known with infinite precision. Therefore, the rotational position, the "time of day" on the nucleus, cannot be extrapolated from the position during the Deep Impact encounter. It might be possible to determine it from the light curve, but it might not, and by the time the light curve would be easily observed from Stardust it would be too late to modify the encounter time. There is also not a lot of fuel on board, so they can't make big velocity changes. Therefore, it is hard to imagine any ability to time the encounter to image the crater.<br /><br />However, as adastragrl says, viewing either side results in welcome new data. Either we see what has been seen and look for changes, or see what has not been seen and look for new features and fill in the shape model.<br /><br />Does anyone know the encounter distance (probably limited by the rate limits for tracking the nucleus) from which we can calculate the limiting resolution? Doe anyone know that limiting resolution?<br /><br />Does anyone know the distance from the sun at the encounter, and how that compares to the distance during the Wild 2 encounter? That may have some effect on the imaging.<br /><br />Also, keep in mind that the Stardust Navigation Camera is small and is not in the best shape. While the Deep Impact High Resolution Instrument images need to be compensated for defocus, Stardust Nav Cam images need to be processed to remove the hazy background from the contaminated detector window. Of course, the resulting images from both are still spectacular.