No! It completely drops the space dimensions out of the physic of spacetime (thus making space, all space, an absolute, aka absolutely "rigid" or "rigid body", dimensionality) and in space's place stretches out the time dimension elastically. It singularizes, or merges, observation with reality on the other end of what is observed by the preferred observer, thus, in fact, totally ignoring, throwing out, the "slowness" of the constant of the speed of light over any distance, particularly SPOL's "slowness" to cover all increasing distances between spatial points. It transfers "slowness," "slowing" (but not the "equal but opposite" time physic of speeding up where and when oncoming . . . thus a net of zero) to time itself. There are no adjustments to the magnitude of space or direction of the real-time object (which, in reality, will be no longer under the observation of the observer . . . no longer "relative" to the observer (will be divided in space and time -- into two or more -- away from the "relative" subjective object (thus its time, its clock) under observation by the observer).In a hypershape isn't the 4th dimension usually the scaling of the hypershape. Might that make the 4th dimension of spacetime its expansion?
Then I am sorry, too. If you aren't understanding the words and meaning of "time dilation" (not "spacetime" dilation, but "time" dilation) (not "space" dilation, but "time" dilation), then there is nothing I can do to explain it to you. It is in the very word "time" in "time dilation" that it loses all connection with space and spacetime. SPACE-TIME implies a unity that does not exist regarding "time dilation." It makes time elastic (there being no division whatsoever between observed time and real time in it, thus a lazy naked singularity physic of the two) and keeps space a "rigid body" of rigid points (as Einstein described) entity.Apologies Atlan, I don't understand. Is this your own hypothesis, or is there any material you can point me to, to get a better grasp on what you are saying?
like an unborn child both stretching out a womb and yet shrinking it in every way there is by growing in every way toward an expansionist birth from it, or destruction in the stone-rigid Utopia within its enclosed closed system alone. What was once effectively infinite to us is now becoming finite to us . . . to an extreme of finite. Certain people, too many people, still believe in some kind of "time dilation" (totally without -- totally short -- any 'space dilation') magically keeping and saving us in this implosively shrinking warp-bubble "spacetime" womb of Earth.
I don't write in "math salads" as a lot of failed professional theorist mediocrities ("mediocre minds" as Einstein termed them) do. And I looked up the Bogdanoff twins. They were called quacks spouting quackery.I understand the words, just not the word salad they are contained within.
You sound like a ghostwriter for the Bogdanoffs.
Information only propagates locally. Universally, in the infinities in and beyond the Horizon, it is never created or destroyed (never was, never will be).IMO
There is only a universal now and a variable rate at which information can propagate.
This rate of propagation is what measure and call time.
Information only propagates locally. Universally, in the infinities in and beyond the Horizon, it is never created or destroyed (never was, never will be).
Look up in Wikipedia the figurative, illustrative, construct of the "Klein bottle," it's latitudinal and longitudinal flow lines. There is plenty there in that Wikipedia article to contemplate and apply elsewhere in physics and cosmology.that's quite the assumption.
could be that the event horizon is just a temporal illusion as we ride into a gravity tsunami wave of sorts.
in half a wavelength the expansion could reverse.