dryson":2ed7n5r8 said:
Observation's made in 1919? Is this the year 1919?
And yet you, or anyone else, could go out at the next solar eclipse and make the same observations. That's the thing about facts ... they persist.
dryson":2ed7n5r8 said:
Get a pair of better glasses?
I took this course at DeVry. The teacher that was teaching the subject wore glasses and continued to promote how everyone should look through his glasses to see his world and how he preceived the world.
Devry ... that explains a lot. BTW your teacher, if he actually said that, was wrong. You, looking through his glasses, won't see the world the way he does w/o them. I suspect though he was using a metaphor, which went right over your head.
dryson":2ed7n5r8 said:
You are doing nothing more than trying to project a percetion of how you want people to see what you see based upon the glasses that you have to wear because of your eyes not being able to focus to create a clear image.
Glasses that are created to allow someone to be able to see based upon their sight needed corrected because of the biological factor involved of the mechanics behind how the eye takes in the light is not the same thing as "seeing through the looking glass to image that you have somehow twisted the reality around you to make yourself feel like you have some type of supernatural power.
But I do, I do have superpowers !!
Perhaps you could explain how your post relates, in any way, to the physics of refraction or gravitational lensing.