Question How Could Einstein Come Up With Quantum Entanglement

[Space Hunter]

How Could Einstein Come Up With Quantum Entanglement and Worm Holes

What physics laws made him come up with that

 

[Jim Franklin]

The Special Theory of Relativity published in 1905
The General Theory of Relativity published in 1915

Have a read of those Space.com articles on the relevent aspect of it.

You should know that the genius of Einstein, by his own admission, was by reading the work other has undertaken, and seeing the links between them, this is what inspired him to evolve his Theory of Relativity. Einstien gets a lot of credit, but he himself said

“It is not that I'm so smart. But I stay with the questions much longer. The others worked hard on their discoveries, but they then moved on to make new ones, I am stubborn, I saw how the seperate ideas where linked and I joined them together, think of me as the secretary of science, putting everything right the managers did wrong"

 

[Classical Motion]

Einstein came up with a mathematical solution for a misunderstood postulate.

A mathematical explanation for a constant velocity of light….. from relative motion.

What he and others do not know……. Is the light has a constant speed…… but NOT a constant velocity.

He gave a solution for the wrong question.

The proper question is HOW does a thing have a constant speed, but NOT a constant velocity.

And that solution is……. A duty cycle. Not a frequency.

Intermittent speed. The speed is constant, only the intermittent duration changes with motion.

The intermittent part shifts, not the speed part.

Ta-DA. Light is only half of what you think it is. And that interrupting half is what shifts.

 

[Jim Franklin]

Einstein came up with a mathematical solution for a misunderstood postulate.

A mathematical explanation for a constant velocity of light….. from relative motion.

What he and others do not know……. Is the light has a constant speed…… but NOT a constant velocity.

He gave a solution for the wrong question.

The proper question is HOW does a thing have a constant speed, but NOT a constant velocity.

And that solution is……. A duty cycle. Not a frequency.

Intermittent speed. The speed is constant, only the intermittent duration changes with motion.

The intermittent part shifts, not the speed part.

Ta-DA. Light is only half of what you think it is. And that interrupting half is what shifts.

Can I humbly suggest you go back and read a physics book - and not one for 5 year olds or those who think the world is flat, but a real one that will explain to you why your post is clearly nonsensical and utter tosh.

 

[Gibsense]

Einstein came up with a mathematical solution for a misunderstood postulate.

A mathematical explanation for a constant velocity of light….. from relative motion.

What he and others do not know……. Is the light has a constant speed…… but NOT a constant velocity.

He gave a solution for the wrong question.

The proper question is HOW does a thing have a constant speed, but NOT a constant velocity.

And that solution is……. A duty cycle. Not a frequency.

Intermittent speed. The speed is constant, only the intermittent duration changes with motion.

The intermittent part shifts, not the speed part.

Ta-DA. Light is only half of what you think it is. And that interrupting half is what shifts.

I am trying to understand your comment. A velocity is a speed but also a direction. So, you seem to imply that light can have various directions. This is obvious so you mention frequency which I suppose = duty cycle. You mention intermittent so I guess you regard the frequency as on off on off. So, the 'on' part is always the same but the off part can change. That is what you are saying I think.

If so this arrangement is supposed to explain why the speed of light is a constant I guess as: 'the time taken by the off bit varies'. this doesn't work because different wavelengths would have different 'off' lengths but in reality, different wavelengths all behave the same when we look at the 'speed of light'

You have made this statement so many times before I had to try to understand this time.

 

[Jim Franklin]

I am trying to understand your comment. A velocity is a speed but also a direction. So, you seem to imply that light can have various directions. This is obvious so you mention frequency which I suppose = duty cycle. You mention intermittent so I guess you regard the frequency as on off on off. So, the 'on' part is always the same but the off part can change. That is what you are saying I think.

If so this arrangement is supposed to explain why the speed of light is a constant I guess as: 'the time taken by the off bit varies'. this doesn't work because different wavelengths would have different 'off' lengths but in reality, different wavelengths all behave the same when we look at the 'speed of light'

You have made this statement so many times before I had to try to understand this time.

It will give you a headache, its nonsense that makes no sense, in English or as statements about science. This type of comment usually gets put about by people to other to make it sound like they understand a subject when in fact they haven't the foggiest idea.