Is the bar higher for scientific claims of alien life?

Nov 14, 2019
22
9
10,515
There certainly seems to be a deep prejudice against life on Mars. It should be remembered that the first searcher for Martian life was the Viking rover and one of it's experiments (the Limited Release experiment) returned a positive result.

One wonders if the ALH84001 meteorite, shown in the photo, had been an Earth rock if it would be taken as a sign of life.

Instead, in both cases, and in the case of other Martian meteorites, the scientific community tried to create somewhat convoluted explanations as to how natural processes could explain them.

One source of this prejudice that cannot be discounted is Science Fiction which conflates life with civilization. War of the Worlds just wouldn't be the same if it were War of the Martian Microbes. Although it is Earth microbes that ultimately defeat the Martians.
 
Viking experiment documented the generation of oxygen, not the presence of life. There are many ways to make oxygen, including with perchlorates which exist in Martian soil.
They can tell you when the Alan Hills meteorite was blasted off Mars, what spot on Mars it originated from, how long it was in transit.
 
Nov 14, 2019
22
9
10,515
Viking experiment documented the generation of oxygen, not the presence of life. There are many ways to make oxygen, including with perchlorates which exist in Martian soil.
They can tell you when the Alan Hills meteorite was blasted off Mars, what spot on Mars it originated from, how long it was in transit.
You are right that the scientists' consensus is that the LR experiments were flawed but rather than launching a better experiment none of the subsequent landers had any experiments that directly searched for microbial life .

As for the meteorite, of course it is Martian. My point is that in a similar sample of Earth rock, such formations would be interpreted as signs of ancient Earth microbial life.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts