Read the latest news about NASA's James Webb Space Telescope.
James Webb Space Telescope : Read more
James Webb Space Telescope : Read more
It was clear enough. Quite clear.It's clear that the universe is expanding, thus not a static form. So what do you mean in your implied difference between "formed" and "forms"?
The only thing wrong with the Big Bang Theory is its dimensionality and Biblical-like religious association with the Creation legends of so many cultures of history. You put horizontal space and vertical time (past (into the future) | future (into the past), the "turning" of countless clock-wheels of time <|> // >|<), mass and energy, infinite and infinitesimal, [fbb2 0 (null unity) | 1 (unity)], Planck and Big Bang Horizon (one and the same Horizon (including being the Big (Black) Hole Horizon)), geometry into it and that falls apart on the face of it.I thought that the James Webb telescope was going to debunk a few lesser known theories, but the possibility that the JWS may have proven the Big Bang theory wrong is astonishing to me.
The evidence was the JWS's discovery of a group of galaxys.
Now this has not been verified yet, but if these galaxys are as big and are as far away as the JWS suggests, this could be smoking gun proff that the Big Bang theory is wrong.
To clarify, this new theory does not suggest that the universe is not expanding, or has never been expanding.
The fact is the early universe was much smaller, denser, and hotter and this is not in dispute.
It just means that the expansion of the universe did not begin at some infinitesimally small point.
It means that the early universe may have resembled one of those old steady state models of an indefinite size.
And at some point in time, the steady state model began to expand as it continues today and into the future.
Now this potential discovery about the big bang is huge news, but the implications of what the JWS could discover could be alot more significant.I thought that the James Webb telescope was going to debunk a few lesser known theories, but the possibility that the JWS may have proven the Big Bang theory wrong is astonishing to me.
The evidence was the JWS's discovery of a group of galaxys.
Now this has not been verified yet, but if these galaxys are as big and are as far away as the JWS suggests, this could be smoking gun proff that the Big Bang theory is wrong.
To clarify, this new theory does not suggest that the universe is not expanding, or has never been expanding.
The fact is the early universe was much smaller, denser, and hotter and this is not in dispute.
It just means that the expansion of the universe did not begin at some infinitesimally small point.
It means that the early universe may have resembled one of those old steady state models of an indefinite size.
And at some point in time, the steady state model began to expand as it continues today and into the future.
Imagine one day, the JWS is peering deep into the cosmos, way beyond the Hubble ultra deep feild, and there it is, in high definition:
The face of God!!!
You are time late and a dollar short. That "face" you speak of is there every time some human or alien wherever, whenever, goes out on a clear night and looks up toward the universe. An infinity and eternity moment immediately to....Now this potential discovery about the big bang is huge news, but the implications of what the JWS could discover could be alot more significant.
Imagine one day, the JWS is peering deep into the cosmos, way beyond the Hubble ultra deep feild, and there it is, in high definition:
The face of God!!!
But by the same token the JWS could discover absolute proof that God does not, and never has existed.
I know everyone want's to know as much as we can about the universe, and the JWS can help us get there.
But if you are a creation astronomer or an evolution astronomer, I would like to impart some wisdom to you:
Be carefully what you wish for, because you just might get it.