Hello!
My name is Joao Carlos and I have developed a theory called the "Decreasing Universe" that offers an alternative explanation for the observed effects attributed to dark energy and Hubble's Law, without invoking dark energy. The central hypothesis of this theory is that gravitational fields cause space—and all entities within it—to contract.
Consequently, as we undergo this contraction, objects outside our gravitational field appear to recede, giving the impression that they are moving farther away.
In contrast to the LCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model, which posits that more massive galaxies exhibit higher redshifts due to photons losing energy while escaping the galaxy's gravitational pull,
The "Decreasing Universe" theory suggests a more important mechanism: While it acknowledges that photons lose energy escaping a galaxy's gravity, it also proposes that the galaxy itself contracts over time because of its gravitational field.
This contraction leads to a decrease in the photon's wavelength, effectively increasing its energy.
As a result, in this model, more massive galaxies would display smaller redshifts.
To evaluate and compare my theory with the LCDM model, I have devised a potential falsifiable prediction:
*Prediction:* For galaxies at the same luminal distance, the "Decreasing Universe" theory predicts that more massive galaxies will exhibit lower redshifts on average. In contrast, the ?CDM model suggests that more massive galaxies should have higher redshifts due to the energy loss of photons escaping their gravitational fields.
*Implications:* Observational data showing that, at a given distance, more massive galaxies consistently have lower redshifts would support the "Decreasing Universe" theory and challenge the ?CDM model. Conversely, if more massive galaxies are observed to have higher redshifts, it would corroborate the ?CDM model and refute the "Decreasing Universe" hypothesis.
This prediction provides a clear observational test to distinguish between the two models, offering a pathway to validate or falsify the proposed theory.
[Important Note
Luminal distance is important , IN THIS CASE, because you cannot use redshift to calculate distances because the "L-CDM_redshift_Distance" is already biased by the mass of the galaxies!)]
To understand the Theory , you can see these Links:
Derivation Hubble:
Decreasing universe: the distance as a function of redshift :
medcraveonline.com
Comments will be apreciated.
Thank You
Joao Carlos
My name is Joao Carlos and I have developed a theory called the "Decreasing Universe" that offers an alternative explanation for the observed effects attributed to dark energy and Hubble's Law, without invoking dark energy. The central hypothesis of this theory is that gravitational fields cause space—and all entities within it—to contract.
Consequently, as we undergo this contraction, objects outside our gravitational field appear to recede, giving the impression that they are moving farther away.
In contrast to the LCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model, which posits that more massive galaxies exhibit higher redshifts due to photons losing energy while escaping the galaxy's gravitational pull,
The "Decreasing Universe" theory suggests a more important mechanism: While it acknowledges that photons lose energy escaping a galaxy's gravity, it also proposes that the galaxy itself contracts over time because of its gravitational field.
This contraction leads to a decrease in the photon's wavelength, effectively increasing its energy.
As a result, in this model, more massive galaxies would display smaller redshifts.
To evaluate and compare my theory with the LCDM model, I have devised a potential falsifiable prediction:
*Prediction:* For galaxies at the same luminal distance, the "Decreasing Universe" theory predicts that more massive galaxies will exhibit lower redshifts on average. In contrast, the ?CDM model suggests that more massive galaxies should have higher redshifts due to the energy loss of photons escaping their gravitational fields.
*Implications:* Observational data showing that, at a given distance, more massive galaxies consistently have lower redshifts would support the "Decreasing Universe" theory and challenge the ?CDM model. Conversely, if more massive galaxies are observed to have higher redshifts, it would corroborate the ?CDM model and refute the "Decreasing Universe" hypothesis.
This prediction provides a clear observational test to distinguish between the two models, offering a pathway to validate or falsify the proposed theory.
[Important Note
Luminal distance is important , IN THIS CASE, because you cannot use redshift to calculate distances because the "L-CDM_redshift_Distance" is already biased by the mass of the galaxies!)]To understand the Theory , you can see these Links:
Derivation Hubble:
Decreasing universe: the distance as a function of redshift :
Decreasing universe: the distance as a function of redshift
Using the “Decreasing Universe” model1 we will show evidence that this new model of the dynamics of the Universe is less disruptive and more adequate than the traditional Λ-CDM model that postulates the existence of Dark Energy. We will also develop, from this new theory, a simple and...
medcraveonline.com
Comments will be apreciated.
Thank You
Joao Carlos
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram