<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Not sure what you are asking. A laser is outgoing electromagnetic radiation. A telescope sees electromagnetic radiation coming at us. A distant planet is already illuminated by it's parent star. <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p> </p><p>I am not sure what the poster is getting at, but something like this would be interesting to try;</p><p> </p><p>Take a laser pointer, and scan a distant object with a raster pattern. Watch the scanning of the object with a lens/photocell combination, and arrange for the pixel size equivalent of the photocell gadget to be vastly larger than the diameter of the beam impinging on the target.</p><p> (assume we do this in the dark, BTW) </p><p>Record the brightness of the beam as it scans the target, and then convert the point by point brightness levels back into a picture.</p><p> </p><p>It seems this scheme would generate a recognizable photo of an object with an optical reception arrangement of vastly lower resolution than you paid for. (save big $$)</p><p> </p><p>How does this help us ??</p><p> </p><p>If the laser spot was visible from ~50 miles away, one could, in theory make photos of small regions on the lunar dark side (for instance) from orbit. This might be how we get a picture of a potential landing site in a permanently shadowed polar crater.</p><p> </p><p>Refinements of the technique might employ a tunable laser for color pictures. Maybe someday someone uses an IR variation of this to image Huygens on Titan . . .</p><p> </p><p>Interesting . . . </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#ff0000"><strong>TPTB went to Dallas and all I got was Plucked !!</strong></font></p><p><font color="#339966"><strong>So many people, so few recipes !!</strong></font></p><p><font color="#0000ff"><strong>Let's clean up this stinkhole !!</strong></font> </p> </div>