I found interstellar asteroid impacts within Earth’s geological record 5 years ago.
We would all like to see the evidence for this claim as it seems the most extraordinary. Not meaning to be hostile here at all, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. Providing some, and not just more undocumented commentary, would dramatically help your position.
Moving on to Mars:
Geomartian, there is a major problem with you notion that an impactor at Hellas Planitia 200 mya resulted in the northern flood planes of Mars.
First of all, numerous searches tell us that Hellas Planitia likely formed during the Late Heavy Bombardment period of the Solar System, approximately 4.1 to 3.8 billion years ago. That puts a major dent (no pun intended) in the notion that this massive impact "opposite" of the flood planes resulted in their formation 200 mya. It is seems unikely that the experts on this crater could be off by a factor of ca. 20x on its age!
Now that there is this major issue of age of the impact and age of the flood planes, I would offer an alternative for the flood planes formation, and it does result from the impact at Hellas Planitia, but in a much different way.
It is impossible to believe that even a large impactor at Hellas Planitia is going to pass through most of the planet and then exit on the opposite side of entry, regardless of its likely speed. Not going to happen. When the object hits, it is going to start excavating a large amount of the impact zone, and throw much of the impactor and surface material into an ejecta blanket surrounding the impact site, or back into space.
What remains of the impactor begins to melt and this molten form, retaining significant momentum, is going to start melting the Martian subsurface rock in its immediate (and surrounding) path. Melting all that Martian rock is going to slow the asteroid's remaining molten mass very quickly as it loses both heat and velocity. I doubt very many people accept that it went into the planet and exited.
More than likely, it would have fractured the crust in the direction of its impact shock wave (i.e. the North's "crust"). Such fracturing would allow a "path of least resistance" for any future lava eruptions, easily explaining the vast flood planes which occurred much later, probably from a molten mantle which has probably solidified by now.
The more I read of your posts, the less believable they are. You still have not provided me with a reference or link to that "steam emission" image of Mars. I am guessing it was photo-shopped and is not real. All my searching comes up empty on this.
And you note: "Oumuamua and Borisov forced NASA/Houston into acknowledging the existence of high velocity interstellar objects." Why would these object have "forced" them to acknowledge such a thing? Are they hiding more information on aliens and flying saucers too? Regrettably, there is clearly something questionable about the "evidence" you have presented, and its evaluation.
However, I do thank you for providing me an opportunity to brush up on the geology of Mars. That much is well appreciated.