As a thought experiment these kinds of ideas a learning and teaching function I suppose but they aren't really global warming solutions. In-space resource utilization even at small demonstration scale is not yet a thing, let alone large scale manufacturing that uses asteroid resources. Launch capabilities of sufficient scale and low cost are not yet a thing either. They aren't even close to viability. Addressing global warming can't wait on that changing.
Homer10, I would expect the hypothetical positioning to account for light and solar wind pressure, ie a bit sunward of where "stationary" would be without the attached mirror, with the mass making it move less, but anything expected to stay in an orbiting position long term has to have the ability to move.