milliseconds after the Big Bang

[the_bearcat]

What do you guys think?<br /><br />http://www.spacedaily.com/news/bigbang-05a.html

 

[yevaud]

I think it says, yes, "Page Not Found."<br /><br />IMO. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

 

[Leovinus]

I think it says "Not Found".<br /><br />I also think you must have a different browser if you saw "Page Not Found". <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[yevaud]

Until my DSL begins later this week, AOL's nasty little browser. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

 

[Leovinus]

Speaking of Big Bangs, have you seen "The Island"? There's a scene with railroad wheels... <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[yevaud]

Ahh, afraid not. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Differential Diagnosis:  </em>"<strong><em>I am both amused and annoyed that you think I should be less stubborn than you are</em></strong>."<br /> </p> </div>

 

[the_bearcat]

Is it any good?<br /><br />(I fixed the link btw...)<img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" />

 

[Leovinus]

Ok, back on topic:<br /><br />I think that this is science at its best: When you conduct your experiment to prove your hypothesis and get completely surprising results. <br /><br />1) You learn something new<br />2) You rewrite the textbooks<br /><br />FYI: "Miliseconds" is misspelled. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[majornature]

Very interesting. I wonder how they figured that out?<br /><br />Can you find a more detailed info on this liquid theory after the Big Bang?<br /><br /><font color="black"><b>True Knowledge Exists in knowing That you Know</b></font><font color="white"><b>NOTHING!!!!!</b></font>/safety_wrapper> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="2" color="#14ea50"><strong><font size="1">We are born.  We live.  We experiment.  We rot.  We die.  and the whole process starts all over again!  Imagine That!</font><br /><br /><br /><img id="6e5c6b4c-0657-47dd-9476-1fbb47938264" style="width:176px;height:247px" src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/14/4/6e5c6b4c-0657-47dd-9476-1fbb47938264.Large.jpg" alt="blog post photo" width="276" height="440" /><br /></strong></font> </div>

 

[emperor_of_localgroup]

Looks like it's time to change the THEORY. But not the idea of Big Bang!!!!! <br /><br />I know what they'll do.<br />They will add some dark/white/green/blue/red matter or energy in their theory and force those quarks and whatever into liquid. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="2" color="#ff0000"><strong>Earth is Boring</strong></font> </div>

 

[R1]

is this 'fluid' actually supposed to be of zero mass at the early stage?<br /><br />I'll incorporate the experiment info into my thinking, but I'm not sure when 'mass'<br />I mean mass that is affected by gravity actually forms. If the 'fluid' is<br />already massive then gravity and a sudden major slowdown in all nearby clocks<br />from the sudden massive appearance of gravity might need to be considered.<br /><br /><br />(The other part I wonder about is the stuff that emanated from the Bang<br />at speeds of aproximately 50 x c . The primordial emanation, and technically not necessarily from a 'bang' but just from a 'there'.)<br /><br />cool article, interesting.<br /><br /><br /><br /><font color="yellow">The waters may very well have been around, and light was<br />thereafter confirmed to be. </font> <br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[Leovinus]

It's interesting that you would reference clocks slowing down just milliseconds after the big bang. I didn't think clocks could be built that fast. Maybe it's like a zillion monkeys pounding out a copy of Hamlet. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>

 

[emperor_of_localgroup]

My personal opinion about Astro theories is 'the carriage is moving ahead of the horse'. Theories of astrophysics have advanced way ahead of observations. Now as observational techniques are improving, we'll see more and more discrepancies between theory and observations.<br /><br />On the other hand, theories and experiments in other scientific fields are more agreeable with each other because theories are verified by experiments on EARTH within a few years. Which is hard to do for Astro theories. Of course there are some exceptions to my comment. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="2" color="#ff0000"><strong>Earth is Boring</strong></font> </div>

 

[5stone10]

Yeah well ...<br /><br />... if this mini Big Bang occurred say 1 or 2 months ago, then this mini-universe is still in its 'Dark Epoch'. I'll hold judgement for, say, 2 or 3 hundred thousand years until galaxies start forming.

 

[R1]

<img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" /><br />well true it seems crazy, Its interesting.<br /><br /><br /><br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>