Big Bang theory contradicts both Special and General relativity

Page 2 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
May 18, 2024
61
8
35
Visit site
So Einstein makes a theory about gravity being a geometrical curvature of space, theory fails miserably, so Einstein doctors it by adding a cosmoillogical constant to counter his curved space gravity, and it fails again. It first predicts that the universe contracts, then postdicts that it is static, and then when he removes the cosmoillogical constant his relativistic universe amazingly stops contracting, and starts expanding, just like Frieddman predicted. Who's Friedmann ? A russian weatherman who not only was much smarter than Einstein, but also understood Einsteins theory better than Einstein himself, who was so stupid that he made two wrong predictions and postdictions in a row. Thats why Einstein said in a moment of frustration that: 'Ever since metamaticians have invaded my theory of relativity, I myself dont understand it anymore'.

Then big bang scientists revive his cosmoillogical blunder and interpret it as dark energy of vacuum. Except acording to Einstein vacuum has no energy because it has no mass. And also according to Einstein energy does not expand space but curves and contracts space. So the energy/mass of vacuum, assuming it exists, just makes the universe contract, and not expand.
 
It's funny for close to a hundred years scientists have been trying to fit the Big Bang theory into whatever research they were working on.
Placing an age on the Universe made people fit the workings within that period.

Imagine dating the universe to 7.8 billion years.

Now imagine producing a Trillion galaxies.
 

Latest posts