Mining for Helium 3 on the Moon

Page 3 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

najab

Guest
><i>Dude, I just told you. As far as we are concerned it is infinity.</i><p>No, I asked you - what is the Q-factor of the Z-machine? Not potentially, not some day - today.</p>
 
N

najab

Guest
I'm trying to remember which European reactor it is that achieved Q=1 a couple years ago - I'm 90% sure it was JET, but can't find a link to a source at the moment.
 
H

henryhallam

Guest
Yep it was JET. But only for a short period of time, less than a second I think, due to magnet overheating & fuel exhaustion.
 
H

henryhallam

Guest
A second or so of sustained Q>1 fusion at JET is a lot closer to a useable power plant than a few microseconds at Sandia. JET has done a magnificent job and paved the way for ITER to demonstrate sustained output at a power level where you could start to recover some energy, over a long period of time.
 
A

avmich

Guest
AFAIK, JT-60U from Japan achieved Q=1,25 (i.e., it produced 25% more energy than it spent) in 2000. Z machine did have a neutron emission (Russians did that in 1991 on Angara-5 reactor, making a long-standing record for neutron emission per pulse), but no actual thermonuclear detonation, thus no microexplosion.<br /><br />But to have a net economic gain, you have to have Q about 10. All current reactors are below it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts