Hi, Andrew <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" /> :<br /><br />I saw this a few days ago, but I had to cram for a math test.<br /><br />I would certainly like to see a New Horizons II. But really, the way to do that is to get Congress and your Parliament and maybe other countries to pony up the money. I guess we must be out of plutonium (?!?). Maybe we could get some from the North Koreans <img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" /> .<br /><br />I tried in Free Space to interest people in talking about what I call, "international enrichment". Nobody was interested in posting on such a thread. A couple of these efforts were around the time of the Russian proposal to Iran. Basically, the idea is to set up international corporations with many countries investing in a common source of enriched uranium or plutonium (yes I do know the difference between Pu-238 and Pu-239 but for Free Space purposes this was minor. More relevant here, though).<br /><br />A New Horizons would do a lot more good if it were redesigned from the ground up. This would include a new powerplant to feed one of the newly developed and extremely exciting electric propulsion systems, like for instance a four grid ion drive (developed in Australia) or a VASIMIR engine (probably better for other missions).<br /><br />The trick for New Horizons II would be to sample each of several different classes of KBO's. We have already sent a probe to a plutino (New Horizons I to Pluto) and several other classes of object need to be examined, low inclination cubewanos, high inclination cubewanos, twotinos, and especially scattered disc objects. Such a mission would require enormous delta v only available with a fissioning reactor.<br /><br />I see some discussion here about the post-Pluto flyby phase of the flight. It's too early to do detailed planning for that. We will have to make do with what we have as far as flight trajectories. There's not much fuel and the gravitational deflection of New Horizon's speedy trajectory c