<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I'd like to ask if it is it true that you can save 25-30% of the required fuel if you use a mag-lev system to launch a spacecraft below mach 1. That's a number I saw somewhere in the net... There's also the issue of vibration above 600 km/h, which some papers say that diamond-shaped flux magnets solve, as well as Inductrack, but they don't say what the new limit is... Any ideas, and has anyone heard any late news regarding maglev? <br />Posted by augustrock</DIV></p><p>Welcome to Space.com!<br /><br />I'm not sure this belongs in Missions and Launches, but for the time being I'll leave it here. Probably would be better off in Space Business and Technology. Although, I fear this will wind up in "The Unexplained" based on the "diamond shaped flux magnets", "somewhere on the net", etc</p><p>What is Inductrack?</p><p>To address your point, launching a spacecraft below Mach one accomplishes nothing. To get into orbit, you need to be traveling ~ 17,500 mph. Mach 1 is ~ 700 mph. We have planes that travel above Mach 1, and they aren't even close to traveling fast enough to get to orbit.</p><p>If you travel at 17,500 mph in the atmosphere, you will burn up very quickly. Those speed can only be sustained when you are above the atmosphere; say 100 miles high. How does a < Mach 1 craft get to 100 miles high without burning up as it accelerates?</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>