M
MeteorWayne
Guest
Andrew, over short periods, indeed the noise levels are large, but over long periods, the signal clearly comes through.<br /><br />The earth is a very stable platform as we understand it's motion so well. <br />I do recall that the first attempts at radial velocity detection failed to correct for all the factors and a false planet was proposed, but as it goes in science the error was found in short order and a retraction was issued.<br />Since then, with over 200 planets detected by this method, they've had plenty of practice, and the process is quite refined.<br /><br />Atmospheric aberration doesn't give false readings.<br />Remember, the radial velocity that is being measured is not being measured by something like a radar reflection that the atmopshere can effect. So it's not velocity in the intuitive sense. The measurement is based on the shift in spectrum of the star (red shift and blue shift), which the atmopshere does not effect.<br /><br />So while spacecraft can do the measurement, it is not required at all.<br /><br />MW <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>