The problem with robots is confirmation. Here on earth, the ALH84001 sample could not be confirmed to be life on mars. I'd be willing to bet that if you really think about it...imagine yourself to be watching TV and its announced that marsbot 1 found life on mars and confirmation was given, despite there being no humans on site and no soil returned...would you be confident in the confirmation?<br /><br />Even if soil is returned, what happens if the microbes die enroute to earth which is highly probable given we wouldn't know how to sustain that which we do not yet know exists. therefore, upon arrival of the microbes to earth...someone is almost certainly going to question whether dead microbes are microbes, or chemical signatures such as the infamous PAHs that the ALH84001 sample may have contained.<br /><br />While its impossible to sterilize a human...we will have to develop the means to investigate potential life on site, otherwise, we may as well remain here and be satisfied with what I see as "Less than satisfactory" robotic confirmation and of course, that may happen. It sort of did when Viking was being prepped for launch while I was in community college. Even at age 20, I knew there would be controversy over any findings by robot...short of something jumping in front of the cameras so to speak. I was right and I'm not a professional scientist and only average in intelligence. I was also not the only one who thought this would happen. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><strong>My borrowed quote for the time being:</strong></p><p><em>There are three kinds of people in life. Those who make it happen, those who watch it happen...and those who do not know what happened.</em></p> </div>