Simulation Shows Bacteria Could Live on Mars

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rlb2

Guest
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">Now, building on a tradition of ground-based simulation that extends back to 1958, a new series of experiments, conducted by an interdisciplinary research team from the Faculty of Natural Sciences of the University of Aarhus, Denmark, suggests that indeed bacteria could survive beneath the martian soil.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">The team constructed a Mars Environmental Simulation Chamber (MESCH), from which air is removed with a vacuum pump, and replaced with a thin mixture of gases equivalent to those in the martian atmosphere. The chamber has a double wall cooled with liquid nitrogen to simulate the cold temperatures experienced in the martian night. </span></p><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><font color="#000080">While exposure to 80 days in the simulated martian environment essentially sterilized the topmost two centimeters of the simulated sample core, bacteria were <font color="#ff0000">"relatively unaffected"</font> in the rest of the 30 centimeter sample tubes.</font> This result, presented in a paper which is due to appear soon in the journal <em>Astrobiology</em>, suggests that some form of life could exist below the martian surface.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">The Faculty of Natural Sciences supported the construction of the MESCH instrument, and the experiments are supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><font color="#5574b9">http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/081204-am-mars-soil.html</font></span></p></span> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> Ron Bennett </div>
 
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Now, building on a tradition of ground-based simulation that extends back to 1958, a new series of experiments, conducted by an interdisciplinary research team from the Faculty of Natural Sciences of the University of Aarhus, Denmark, suggests that indeed bacteria could survive beneath the martian soil.The team constructed a Mars Environmental Simulation Chamber (MESCH), from which air is removed with a vacuum pump, and replaced with a thin mixture of gases equivalent to those in the martian atmosphere. The chamber has a double wall cooled with liquid nitrogen to simulate the cold temperatures experienced in the martian night. While exposure to 80 days in the simulated martian environment essentially sterilized the topmost two centimeters of the simulated sample core, bacteria were "relatively unaffected" in the rest of the 30 centimeter sample tubes. This result, presented in a paper which is due to appear soon in the journal Astrobiology, suggests that some form of life could exist below the martian surface.The Faculty of Natural Sciences supported the construction of the MESCH instrument, and the experiments are supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council.http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/081204-am-mars-soil.html <br />Posted by rlb2</DIV><br /><br />I think that matches what most scientists believe (I know I do). The harder question to answer is whether there ever was microbial life on Mars to survive in the first place. That's why we look :) <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
K

kg

Guest
Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>.....This result, presented in a paper which is due to appear soon in the journal Astrobiology, suggests that some form of life could exist below the martian surface.Posted by rlb2</DIV><br /><br />What would the correct term for life that originated here on earth but was living on another planet?&nbsp; I've read that it might be possible for bacteria to be blasted off of the earth's surface by a meteor impact and survive the journey to the surface of&nbsp;Mars.&nbsp; Extraterrestrial? Superterestrial?&nbsp;
 
M

michaelmozina

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>What would the correct term for life that originated here on earth but was living on another planet?&nbsp; I've read that it might be possible for bacteria to be blasted off of the earth's surface by a meteor impact and survive the journey to the surface of&nbsp;Mars.&nbsp; Extraterrestrial? Superterestrial?&nbsp; <br /> Posted by kg</DIV></p><p>It kinda makes you wonder about the implications of actually introducing the most likely lifeforms we can find on Earth and place them most strategically on Mars.&nbsp; I guess you've have to be certain you've already answered Wayne's question about whether or not life already exists there *before* we start thinking about terraforming the place. :) </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>
 
R

rlb2

Guest
<p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">kg -&nbsp;&nbsp;What would the correct term for life that originated here on earth but was living on another planet?&nbsp;</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">______________________________________________________________-</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">If the past is a measure of it then yes, there is a multitude of different ways that we have infested Mars already. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">Viking Landers were not near as sterile as today&rsquo;s Landers. Bacteria survive the Lunar Landing, nematodes survived the Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster fiery&nbsp;re-entry, Tardigrades survived testing in the complete vacuum of space exposed to high radiation, etc etc.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">Now one of the problems before us is if we find life on Mars is it from Mars or Earth???</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">Here is a video I made several months ago of a nematode&nbsp;like object that appears to&nbsp;move around in the Martian soil from the Phoenix Microscopic Imager. Is it from Mars? Is it from Earth? Or is it,&nbsp;none of the above?&nbsp;</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">It is important to note it isn't enough evidence by itself&nbsp;to stand alone for the existence of a life form living on Mars however the discovery of water-ice and Percholates does help its cause.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:purple">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjjZh98wcVk</span></span></span></p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">Note -&nbsp;I was told by CNN that an older version I made of this animation will be aired on CNN American Morning in the week of thanksgiving... I didn't watch the show, don't know what was they said about it?</span></span></span> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> Ron Bennett </div>
 
F

franontanaya

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>What would the correct term for life that originated here on earth but was living on another planet?</DIV></p><p>Heterochtonous.</p><p>Also, species that settle on barren enviroments are called 'pioneer species'. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
K

kg

Guest
Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>It kinda makes you wonder about the implications of actually introducing the most likely lifeforms we can find on Earth and place them most strategically on Mars.&nbsp; I guess you've have to be certain you've already answered Wayne's question about whether or not life already exists there *before* we start thinking about terraforming the place. :) <br />Posted by michaelmozina</DIV><br /><br />I was thinking of a natural introduction hundreds of millions of years ago of an organism that&nbsp;originated from earth and adapted to the environment on Mars. &nbsp;I was only wondering what it would be called, if it would still be considered alien or if we would have to consider Mars to be some kind of extension of our own biosphere or somthing?&nbsp;
 
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>kg -&nbsp;&nbsp;What would the correct term for life that originated here on earth but was living on another planet?&nbsp;______________________________________________________________-If the past is a measure of it then yes, there is a multitude of different ways that we have infested Mars already. Viking Landers were not near as sterile as today&rsquo;s Landers. Bacteria survive the Lunar Landing, nematodes survived the Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster fiery&nbsp;re-entry, Tardigrades survived testing in the complete vacuum of space exposed to high radiation, etc etc.Now one of the problems before us is if we find life on Mars is it from Mars or Earth???Here is a video I made several months ago of a nematode&nbsp;like object that appears to&nbsp;move around in the Martian soil from the Phoenix Microscopic Imager. Is it from Mars? Is it from Earth? Or is it,&nbsp;none of the above?&nbsp;It is important to note it isn't enough evidence by itself&nbsp;to stand alone for the existence of a life form living on Mars however the discovery of water-ice and Percholates does help its cause.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjjZh98wcVkNote -&nbsp;I was told by CNN that an older version I made of this animation will be aired on CNN American Morning in the week of thanksgiving... I didn't watch the show, don't know what was they said about it? <br />Posted by rlb2</DIV><br /><br />Since the surface environment is so unconducive to life at this time, I doubt that's much of an issue. Since the potential surviveable environment is underground, it seems unlikely any "stuff" on any of our landers could have made it to there before expiring. Though not impossible for sure.</p><p>Certainly, if microbes were able to survive the journey from earth to Mars in the interior of meteoroids, and the surface was more friendly "back then", we could have seeded life there. Of course, that is much easier to do in the Mars to Earth direction, so the odds are at least as high that Martian life seeded ours.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
R

rlb2

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'> Of course, that is much easier to do in the Mars to Earth direction, so the odds are at least as high that Martian life seeded ours. <br />Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">True however the 1500 Diameter Hellas basin on Mars, deepest crater in our solar system at over 10 kilometers and the <span style="font-family:Verdana">Aiken Crater</span> on the moon the&nbsp;largest diameter crater in the solar system&nbsp;had enough energy to do this&nbsp;if it happened on earth.&nbsp;A relative small impact, 150 mile diameter </span><span style="font-family:Verdana">Chicxulub Crater</span><span style="font-family:Verdana">&nbsp;on earth as compared to the ones I mentioned above that some theorize killed the dinosaur off had enough energy, tens of thousands time more energy than the Saturn&nbsp;V&nbsp;rocket, to propel a small asteroid fast enough to escape Earth gravitational well. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="font-family:Verdana">On another note it&rsquo;s also a question on if life began here before our moon was created from the theorized Martian size object that impacted Earth or transferred here from that impact???</span></span></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> Ron Bennett </div>
 
M

michaelmozina

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>True however the 1500 Diameter Hellas basin on Mars, deepest crater in our solar system at over 10 kilometers and the Aicken Crater on the moon the&nbsp;largest diameter crater in the solar system&nbsp;had enough energy to do this&nbsp;if it happened on earth.&nbsp;A relative small impact, 150 mile diameter Chicxulub Crater&nbsp;on earth as compared to the ones I mentioned above that some theorize killed the dinosaur off had enough energy&nbsp;to propel a small asteroid fast enough to escape Earth gravitational well. On another note it&rsquo;s also a question on if life began here before our moon was created from the theorized Martian size object that impacted Earth or transferred here from that impact??? <br /> Posted by rlb2</DIV></p><p>It seems to me that the trail of life on Earth goes back so far in time that it seems unlikely to me that life was first able to make a foothold on a different planet in the solar system and ride some sort of material into the Earth's atmosphere. If that were the case with Mars, I would expect we would find quite a few signs of life on Mars, even now, particularly since lifeforms seem to be able to adapt to the harshest conditions here on Earth.&nbsp; That's just my opinion anywway.</p><p>I do believe we will find life is abundant in the universe, but maybe not so abundant in our own solar system. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>
 
K

kg

Guest
Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>It seems to me that the trail of life on Earth goes back so far in time that it seems unlikely to me that life was first able to make a foothold on a different planet in the solar system and ride some sort of material into the Earth's atmosphere. Posted by michaelmozina</DIV><br /><br />Is it&nbsp;possible that life as we know it needed diversity of environments to get started?&nbsp; The early solar system might have been a very chaotic place what with planets smashing into one another all kinds of stuff getting tossed about and shuffled around.&nbsp; Maybe life needed some crazy improbable sequence of events to become what we know it to be.&nbsp; In which case life in the universe might be harder to come by than you might think.
 
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>True however the 1500 Diameter Hellas basin on Mars, deepest crater in our solar system at over 10 kilometers and the Aiken Crater on the moon the&nbsp;largest diameter crater in the solar system&nbsp;had enough energy to do this&nbsp;if it happened on earth.&nbsp;A relative small impact, 150 mile diameter Chicxulub Crater&nbsp;on earth as compared to the ones I mentioned above that some theorize killed the dinosaur off had enough energy, tens of thousands time more energy than the Saturn&nbsp;V&nbsp;rocket, to propel a small asteroid fast enough to escape Earth gravitational well. On another note it&rsquo;s also a question on if life began here before our moon was created from the theorized Martian size object that impacted Earth or transferred here from that impact??? <br />Posted by rlb2</DIV><br /><br />From what I've seen the moon creating impact would have been a sterilizing even for both original objects and any debris. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
M

michaelmozina

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Is it&nbsp;possible that life as we know it needed diversity of environments to get started?&nbsp; The early solar system might have been a very chaotic place what with planets smashing into one another all kinds of stuff getting tossed about and shuffled around.&nbsp; Maybe life needed some crazy improbable sequence of events to become what we know it to be.&nbsp; In which case life in the universe might be harder to come by than you might think. <br /> Posted by kg</DIV></p><p>Even assuming all of this is so, the universe seems to be very vast.&nbsp; It is populated with stars that are far more abundant than all the grains of sand on every beach on Earth.&nbsp; It seems to me that it would be a "terrible waste of space" if life is not "abundant" in the universe.&nbsp; :)&nbsp;</p><p>Purely from "law of averages" perspective, it seems as though the mathematical odds are in favor of life on a wide scale.&nbsp; Whether or not it is 'intelligent life" by our standards remains to be seen by Drake's equations would seem to suggest that even duplication of intelligent life is "likely" given the law of averages.</p><p>There is also evidence that the basic building blocks of life have been available to form life as we know it as far back in time as we can see.</p><p>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2992313.stm</p><p>http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=17525 </p><p>The second link I added later when I realized I posted the wrong link the first time. </p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>
 
M

michaelmozina

Guest
<p>I suppose it would be way too early to send a robotic mission to Mars with the express intent of introducing bacteria and lifeforms that might survive on Mars.&nbsp; It would also be advantageous to know if life is aready there *before* we start introducing life on the planet. </p><p>Considering the cost of a human mission to Mars, and the likelihood that we would introduce life to Mars inadvertently anyway, the curious side of me wonders if we shouldn't try to introduce some living organisms on Mars with the express intent of finding out if they will survive on Mars. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. - Kristian Birkeland </div>
 
M

marsbug

Guest
<p>It would be, however at some point we'll have to admit defeat (unless we find something). I think enginneering mars to support simple life might be fairly simple. All the ingredients are there for a habitable world, and it may well have been following volcanic episodes or major meteor strikes in the past. </p><p>One of the things we can do now is refine simulations like this one, try to identify which species might have a fighting chance on mars, and how much conditions would need to change for something to take hold. This helps both the search for past life and hopes for seeding it in the future.</p>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts