The expansion of the universe is often described as space "stretching," but it's a bit more nuanced than that. In cosmology, space itself doesn't stretch like a rubber sheet—it expands in a way that increases the distance between objects without them physically moving through space.
One way to think about it is that new space is being created between objects, rather than existing space stretching thinner. This is why galaxies appear to move apart from each other, even though they aren't actively travelling through space in the traditional sense.
Quantum field theory suggests that even "empty" space is filled with quantum fluctuations, where virtual particles pop in and out of existence. Additionally, general relativity treats space as a dynamic entity that can bend, stretch, and expand. This means that space isn't just an absence of matter—it's a fundamental component of reality.
In quantum field theory, the vacuum energy of space is estimated to be incredibly high—potentially around (10^{113}) joules per cubic meter. If we convert this into mass, it would be roughly (10^{93}) grams per cubic meter. However, this value is vastly larger than what we observe in cosmology, leading to the famous "vacuum catastrophe"—a huge discrepancy between theoretical predictions and actual measurements.
One way to think about it is that new space is being created between objects, rather than existing space stretching thinner. This is why galaxies appear to move apart from each other, even though they aren't actively travelling through space in the traditional sense.
Quantum field theory suggests that even "empty" space is filled with quantum fluctuations, where virtual particles pop in and out of existence. Additionally, general relativity treats space as a dynamic entity that can bend, stretch, and expand. This means that space isn't just an absence of matter—it's a fundamental component of reality.
In quantum field theory, the vacuum energy of space is estimated to be incredibly high—potentially around (10^{113}) joules per cubic meter. If we convert this into mass, it would be roughly (10^{93}) grams per cubic meter. However, this value is vastly larger than what we observe in cosmology, leading to the famous "vacuum catastrophe"—a huge discrepancy between theoretical predictions and actual measurements.
Last edited: