Spontaneous Real Time

[Atlan0001]

Roots (past histories) and branches (future histories) are unrealities that spring from a 0-point (EWF) trunk of spontaneous "real time." There is no other "real time moment"! And the "dipole moment" of the universe is the quantum entanglement of 0-point center (Planck Horizon) and the Horizon "at a distance", which are actually one and the same Horizon.

Can I prove it? Probably by way of light time never being a continuous beam of light but being single-sided 2-dimensional frames of light time. One proof.

 

[Classical Motion]

I don't believe that time is related to space. I believe time comes from the motion of length. A constant motion of a constant length. And time is set by that length and is omnipresent thru-out the universe. The same second here is the same second on the far side of cosmos. That length and the motion of that length is exactly the same thru -out the cosmos.

Space is not related to anything, for there is nothing in space. Space is a void area for physicality to exist in.

And after eons of propagation, we have a blanket of electrical static which now occupies space, but is not from space. The static is just a temporary residence. It's an excrement of mass. Because mass can only posses certain energy levels, and must excrete the rest..........................and we get static.

There are many fairy tales about this static. A whole science of fairy tales and complete fiction.

The superposition of static. Study on.

 

[Atlan0001]

There is no length to a spontaneous instant moment (to the quantum entangled dipole moment) of "spontaneous real time." You will never get down to the infinitesimal (to the infinite) of "real time." Spontaneous real time!

Lengths, frequencies = histories (past-future histories). Universe simulations. Universe holograms. Roots rooting out from the trunk of a spontaneous real time moment. Branches branching from the trunk of a spontaneous real time moment. The falseness of a "SPACETIME" always massless and always zeroed in energy.

 

[Atlan0001]

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree springs and grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't spring and grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (asymptotic instant moment's (t=0) effects to causes / causes to effects).
Roots = past histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (negative cone curvatures)).
Branches = future histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (positive cone curvatures)).
Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (fixed constant (t=0) natural laws, physics).

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree springs and grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't spring and grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

 

[COLGeek]

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (asymptotic instant moment's (t=0) effects to causes / causes to effects).
Roots = past histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (negative cone curvatures)).
Branches = future histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (positive cone curvatures)).
Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (fixed constant (t=0) natural laws, physics).

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

Have you been watching "Loki" on Disney+?

 

[Atlan0001]

Have you been watching "Loki" on Disney+?

No. Why? Also see that I edited #4 to read "springs and grows" rather than just "grows".

 

[COLGeek]

No. Why? Also see that I edited #4 to read "springs and grows" rather than just "grows".

There are notions of the season 2 finale that aligns with Asgardian mythology and post #4 above.

Just pointing out in jest, my friend.

On a more serious note, isn't all real-time spontaneous?

 

[Atlan0001]

Have you been watching "Loki" on Disney+?

I stopped watching all but the 'Book of Boba Fett' and 'The Mandalorian'.

In answer to #7, certainly! But that isn't what I've been reading in the books on cosmology, astrophysics, and physics, I've been buying and reading lately, much less most of the ones I've read over decades.

 

[Atlan0001]

There are notions of the season 2 finale that aligns with Asgardian mythology and post #4 above.

Just pointing out in jest, my friend.

On a more serious note, isn't all real-time spontaneous?

It took me looking at an asymptote straight-line stretching between two mutually opposing curvatures (curving in opposing shapes of curvature) to realize "spontaneous REALTIME."

 

[Atlan0001]

Regarding #4 above but not 'Loki' the second season finale which I watched standalone skipping over the whole series to see what COLGeek was talking about above.

There are infinities of universes in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is. That season finale of the Marvel series 'Loki' gets nonlocality, which is to say infinite, infinitesimal, infinity, infinities, all wrong. And, of course, there is no such thing as dividing by zero, but there is zeroing in canceling to zero two or more nonlocals, two or more infinities, springing the relative finite local. Who said the nonlocal, the infinities, cease to exist in being cancelled to spring the relative finite local?

Infinity is fulfillment already concurrently existing, always and forever co-existing, with any relative finite having infinite potential! It isn't local and it isn't finite! Thus, there are infinities of universes (horizons of universe) in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is!

 

[COLGeek]

Regarding #4 above but not 'Loki' the second season finale which I watched standalone skipping over the whole series to see what COLGeek was talking about above.

There are infinities of universes in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is. That season finale of the Marvel series 'Loki' gets nonlocality, which is to say infinite, infinitesimal, infinity, infinities, all wrong. And, of course, there is no such thing as dividing by zero, but there is zeroing in canceling to zero two or more nonlocals, two or more infinities, springing the relative finite local. Who said the nonlocal, the infinities, cease to exist in being cancelled to spring the relative finite local?

Infinity is fulfillment already concurrently existing, always and forever co-existing, with any relative finite having infinite potential! It isn't local and it isn't finite! Thus, there are infinities of universes (horizons of universe) in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is!

I knew you would enjoy it.

 

[Atlan0001]

Spontaneous REALTIME (once more):

Here NOW! Gone NOW!

The beginning points of time and the end points of time, and the middle points of time, all times at once in one same infinity, eternity, and instant of time.

In other words, ultimately ungraspable illusiveness, utterly immeasurable. Can't be pinned down! At once throughout SPACE outside of SPACETIME. Centripetal (centrifugal) / Centrifugal (centripetal). The Planck Big Bang Horizon frontier of time (t=0). The Hawking "Grand Central Station" Clock (t=0). Albert Einstein's in one context, and Bilbo Baggin's in another, and yet more unspecified, "There and back again" (t=0).

 

[Atlan0001]

Special Relativity:

The Laws of Physics are the Same for All Nonaccelerating Observers: No matter how fast an observer is moving, they will measure the same speed of light and observe the same laws of physics.

The Speed of Light is Constant: The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source.

Conclusions:

Time dilation: the convention from 1905: Time passes slower for objects moving at high speeds compared to those at rest. This effect becomes significant only speeds close to the speed of light.

Length Contraction: Objects contract in length along the direction of motion as they approach the speed of light.

E = mc^2: This famous equation relates energy (E) to mass (m) with the speed of light (c) as the constant of proportionality. It implies that energy and mass are interchangeable....
-------------------------------------------

"No matter how fast an observer is moving...." (Speed is 'local', 'finite', and 'relative' and there exists such equals but opposite elements as 'nonlocal', 'nonfinite', and 'nonrelative').

The Speed of Light is Constant: Constant to an infinitely variable rest . . . an infinitely variable '0'. Light is emitted in spontaneous REALTIME, thus singularly photo-event frame histories.

Conclusions:

Time Dilation: The conventional deals in absolutism alone, explicitly stated and implied. There is no such thing as "close to the speed of light" except in a closed (enclosed) system. The open (opening) system is immeasurable.

Length Contraction: In the open (the opening) system, objects do not contract in length along the direction of motion since they do not ever approach the speed of light. Length contraction, and time dilation. are in the observed, the observable, light clock, not the unobserved, the unobservable, object (clock) always forward -- quantum disentangled and disentangling -- in time of the light "at a distance" (any distance at all going away or oncoming).

E = mc^2: Open or opening 2-d flatland universe surface (aka matter) versus enclosed 3-d spherical universe volume (aka mass-energy): c = +300,000kps |0| -300,000kps as the constant of proportionality (Rest ('|0|'), tensor flexibly, infinitely variable (infinite '0')).

 

[Atlan0001]

Reminder!

There are no straight lines in the universe until a self-powered, self accelerating, universe traveler makes one (warp or wormhole navigates one) by cutting the curvature (cutting curvatures). Nonlocally, nonfinitely, non-relatively, c = *** |0| -300,000kps.

Come to think of it, the observed, the observable, seeming expansion of the universe seemingly faster than the speed of light may also be straight lines cutting the curvatures . . . but these straighter (flatter) lines observable!

 

[Atlan0001]

Again, come to think of it, the straighter the observed (warp / wormhole) lines of the universe at large over the curvatures, the closer in in observability the distances of the overall universe are in appearance and, thus, the greater the reality of (folded dark shadowy) unobserved "fly over country" (so to speak) there should be.

 

[Atlan0001]

I have this elsewhere in Article Commentary, "Dark force theory could solve 2 open cosmic mysteries", but it certainly belongs here as well:

With a multiverse universe extreme density in-depth of verses regarding the folds receding away of the multi-dimensional multiverse is at once extreme shallowness apparent on the ocean's superficial 2-dimensional asymptotic surface of the universe. A traveler wouldn't swim the observed, observable, 2-d surface. the traveler would swim the unobserved, unobservable, volume-energy depths of multi-dimensional multiverse 'surfs' (currents) in/under the observed surface.

An old picture told of nature is that the beauty is observably surface deep and the ugly unobservable in-depth . . . or vice versa since beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

SPACE! is unobservable (just as I've claimed many, many times)! Observable coordinate relative SPACETIMEs (plural) from the instant of photo-frame emissions are cartoon-page past histories (past histories from the instant of emissions) . . . no more, no less. No matter how fast light travels (the 0-d points thick, the 1-d string / 2-d photo-frames deep, travel) spontaneous REALTIME has already passed up the recorded time, the history.

 

[Atlan0001]

"No matter how fast light travels (the 0-d points thick, 1-d string / 2-d photo-frames deep, travel) spontaneous REALTIME has already passed up the recorded time, the history," in the light that is the light, special relativity speaking. Per the "principle of uncertainty" (which applies!), the velocity of light will be certain to the observer, thus the REALTIME position of the traveler, concurrent somewhere in SPACE with the observer's REALTIME position (quantum entangled-like if not in fact quantum entangling). will not . . . will have no observable certainty and, maybe, no mutual relativity at all; Will be a REALTIME object independent of relativity to other REALTIME objects, including REALTIME observers, "at a distance!" Just how big are passing universes (passing by / passing through)?