Spontaneous Real Time

[Atlan0001]

Roots (past histories) and branches (future histories) are unrealities that spring from a 0-point (EWF) trunk of spontaneous "real time." There is no other "real time moment"! And the "dipole moment" of the universe is the quantum entanglement of 0-point center (Planck Horizon) and the Horizon "at a distance", which are actually one and the same Horizon.

Can I prove it? Probably by way of light time never being a continuous beam of light but being single-sided 2-dimensional frames of light time. One proof.

 

[Classical Motion]

I don't believe that time is related to space. I believe time comes from the motion of length. A constant motion of a constant length. And time is set by that length and is omnipresent thru-out the universe. The same second here is the same second on the far side of cosmos. That length and the motion of that length is exactly the same thru -out the cosmos.

Space is not related to anything, for there is nothing in space. Space is a void area for physicality to exist in.

And after eons of propagation, we have a blanket of electrical static which now occupies space, but is not from space. The static is just a temporary residence. It's an excrement of mass. Because mass can only posses certain energy levels, and must excrete the rest..........................and we get static.

There are many fairy tales about this static. A whole science of fairy tales and complete fiction.

The superposition of static. Study on.

 

[Atlan0001]

There is no length to a spontaneous instant moment (to the quantum entangled dipole moment) of "spontaneous real time." You will never get down to the infinitesimal (to the infinite) of "real time." Spontaneous real time!

Lengths, frequencies = histories (past-future histories). Universe simulations. Universe holograms. Roots rooting out from the trunk of a spontaneous real time moment. Branches branching from the trunk of a spontaneous real time moment. The falseness of a "SPACETIME" always massless and always zeroed in energy.

 

[Atlan0001]

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree springs and grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't spring and grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (asymptotic instant moment's (t=0) effects to causes / causes to effects).
Roots = past histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (negative cone curvatures)).
Branches = future histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (positive cone curvatures)).
Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (fixed constant (t=0) natural laws, physics).

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree springs and grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't spring and grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

 

[COLGeek]

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (asymptotic instant moment's (t=0) effects to causes / causes to effects).
Roots = past histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (negative cone curvatures)).
Branches = future histories' causes and effects (SPACETIME (positive cone curvatures)).
Trunk = spontaneous REALTIME (fixed constant (t=0) natural laws, physics).

Possibly one day scientists will realize that the tree grows from the seed trunk into the roots underground as well as the branches above ground. It doesn't grow from the roots up into the seed trunk and branches.

Have you been watching "Loki" on Disney+?

 

[Atlan0001]

Have you been watching "Loki" on Disney+?

No. Why? Also see that I edited #4 to read "springs and grows" rather than just "grows".

 

[COLGeek]

No. Why? Also see that I edited #4 to read "springs and grows" rather than just "grows".

There are notions of the season 2 finale that aligns with Asgardian mythology and post #4 above.

Just pointing out in jest, my friend.

On a more serious note, isn't all real-time spontaneous?

 

[Atlan0001]

Have you been watching "Loki" on Disney+?

I stopped watching all but the 'Book of Boba Fett' and 'The Mandalorian'.

In answer to #7, certainly! But that isn't what I've been reading in the books on cosmology, astrophysics, and physics, I've been buying and reading lately, much less most of the ones I've read over decades.

 

[Atlan0001]

There are notions of the season 2 finale that aligns with Asgardian mythology and post #4 above.

Just pointing out in jest, my friend.

On a more serious note, isn't all real-time spontaneous?

It took me looking at an asymptote straight-line stretching between two mutually opposing curvatures (curving in opposing shapes of curvature) to realize "spontaneous REALTIME."

 

[Atlan0001]

Regarding #4 above but not 'Loki' the second season finale which I watched standalone skipping over the whole series to see what COLGeek was talking about above.

There are infinities of universes in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is. That season finale of the Marvel series 'Loki' gets nonlocality, which is to say infinite, infinitesimal, infinity, infinities, all wrong. And, of course, there is no such thing as dividing by zero, but there is zeroing in canceling to zero two or more nonlocals, two or more infinities, springing the relative finite local. Who said the nonlocal, the infinities, cease to exist in being cancelled to spring the relative finite local?

Infinity is fulfillment already concurrently existing, always and forever co-existing, with any relative finite having infinite potential! It isn't local and it isn't finite! Thus, there are infinities of universes (horizons of universe) in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is!

 

[COLGeek]

Regarding #4 above but not 'Loki' the second season finale which I watched standalone skipping over the whole series to see what COLGeek was talking about above.

There are infinities of universes in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is. That season finale of the Marvel series 'Loki' gets nonlocality, which is to say infinite, infinitesimal, infinity, infinities, all wrong. And, of course, there is no such thing as dividing by zero, but there is zeroing in canceling to zero two or more nonlocals, two or more infinities, springing the relative finite local. Who said the nonlocal, the infinities, cease to exist in being cancelled to spring the relative finite local?

Infinity is fulfillment already concurrently existing, always and forever co-existing, with any relative finite having infinite potential! It isn't local and it isn't finite! Thus, there are infinities of universes (horizons of universe) in that which does not exist, relatively speaking that is!

I knew you would enjoy it.